this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (27 children)

However, the panel felt Destiny Udogie should have received a red card from the referee for his first-half challenge on Raheem Sterling, but it wasn't a clear and obvious error for the VAR to intervene on.

It was a clear and obvious error and VAR should have shown it to the ref to make his own mind on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (25 children)

I still don’t understand this whole clear and obvious error requirement. If the ref misses something, then VAR should intervene and inform the referee to relook at the incident. If he deems his original decision correct, then we move on.

The fact that it’s an error but VAR doesn’t see it as clear and obvious and opts not to direct the ref to the monitor is so weird.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is because I don’t know if ya’ll remember but when VAR started, we had a fuck ton of people here complaining about how long it took and saying it should only show obvious errors.

So that’s what they implemented.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That's not true. They had this clear and obvious line from the first moment VAR was introduced in England. No other league made a meal of "preserving the sanctity of on-field refs" but this stupid league did.

load more comments (23 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)