this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (11 children)

Watching this with my Juventini cousins who are pro-var and they are fuming lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It’s so tough because the whole point of VAR in relation to offsides is to be able to determine if something is offside or it isn’t, which in 99%+ of cases you can see. There are these occasions where something is technically offside, like with a sliver of someone’s boot or a tiny part of their shoulder, but it doesn’t feel like it’s really in the spirit of the rule. In those cases though you can’t say that you’ll allow it because offside is meant to be a black or white decision, and if you let these minuscule infringements go you then need to decide where the line is again.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

The rule needs to be adapted so that every time someone is called offside everyone can agree that the striker was gaining an advantage.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There really needs to be a buffer zone for offsides calls.

There is no skill here, the defender didn't make a conscious attempt to play the attacker offside by 5mm, it's just pure luck.

I'd argue that any advantage an attacker gets inside 30cm is negligible, and hardly worth all this effort to penalise.

At, it feels like we roll the dice to see if a goal stands based on an offside call that neither player knew anything about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Your proposal doesn’t change anything other than create an even more arbitrary point to argue about.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So that just moves the line 30cm. It doesn't solve the problem. Imagine this exact same picture except Kean is 31cm past the last defender, the line is drawn at 30cm from the last man. Same problem

Sure in this case that would make this one definitively onside, but like I said there will be a time when a striker is ~30cm past the last defender and the line drawing becomes an issue again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

But at least you can say he was well offside, and it would be much easier to take. It changes the narrative and players/fans will feel much less hard done by with tight calls.

"if my team had a goal disallowed because the was 31cm offside, it would be much easier to take.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I remember pre-var there was "same hight"

This is definitely same hight, no offside

load more comments (7 replies)