this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
120 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

58964 readers
4190 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Boeing says it can’t make money with fixed-price contracts::"Rest assured we haven't signed any fixed-price development contracts, nor intend to."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (9 children)

As an employee at a production facility in the US, don’t think Boeing is unique in that regard.

These companies have gotten too big to work without exploiting their employees or inflating costs.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

This problem could be solved with a co-op structure even within a free market. If ten workers in a co op produce $100 bucks of extra money, they all get voting power over ten buck, and as long as any new hires can carry their weight so everyone still gets ten bucks surplus to command, they will hire them if you follow the game theory incentives. Once companies get big enough to have diminishing returns, like a new employee could only produce 5 bucks of surplus, then hiring that person would make everyone have a smaller piece of the pie (adding him to our first ten means the share drops to 105/11 or 9.5 dollars.) If the pie(surplus) all goes to one person they can keep adding workers until the worker doesn't produce any surplus over the cost, bloating the departments. Because of this co ops tend to expand to peak productivity, (surplus per worker), rather that peak output (produce as much as we can until it becomes unprofitable to produce)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You are assuming two things:

  • Each worker is paid the same
  • The number of workers in the company affects the market for their products

In a small company, none of this is true.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is a proof of theory, the same way capitalist economists show what options and game theory incentives exist. Its quite literally a textbook example. What I said about co ops is not a new claim, and im not gonna research the exact financials of the mondragon co op to make an example on lemmy lmfao. Also nowhere does my post suggest each worker is paid the same, thats not what surplus means. Nowhere do I assume the number of workers effects the market either, it effects production. Wow you really went out of your way to misread that.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)