this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
1203 points (86.6% liked)

Fuck Cars

9338 readers
281 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Yup, tons more parking and tons more road space per capita as well. Low-density sprawl just needs a lot more stuff per capita.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (20 children)

They should pay a significant land tax instead of leeching off the high-density dwellers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Seems like a good way to get a lot of retired folk to lose their property over taxes, as land value rises above their means

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

There won't be any other taxes for them to pay, so they will have more purchasing power. Chances are, they're still going to have the same place unless that retired guy decides to build a hotel or something on it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)