this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
839 points (97.9% liked)

Apple

18078 readers
36 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 181 points 2 years ago (24 children)

I have a prediction: Airlines won't ackowlege that personal trackers as an effective means to track luggage becuase they're trying to figure out how to force you to buy their own trackers.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I'm still trying to figure out why they don't already use trackers. RFID tags are dirt cheap and it's 20 years old technology. They already have a process where they add barcode stickers at checkin, slap some RFID in there too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think you mean BLE. As far as I understand it, RFID doesn't have any particular advantage over barcodes for tracking luggage.

[–] ironeagl 5 points 2 years ago

RFID is easier to read, so you could set up scanners at more places. Also easier to walk around looking for a bag and know that it's somewhere in this pile.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)