this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
641 points (95.5% liked)
Technology
59598 readers
3509 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
In my opinion, the copyright should be based on the training data. Scraped the internet for data? Public domain. Handpicked your own dataset created completely by you? The output should still belong to you. Seems weird otherwise.
I think the issue is that it's really really hard to build a model that only uses data from one source.
But if someone/company were to provide/produce millions of pieces of their own training data they can build a model that is solely owned by them, or make that available for licensing.
But how do you prove what data gets distilled into a model? Especially if it takes an enormous amount of time and energy to build the model?
Perhaps there needs to be a way to permanently tag input information that is used to build models... and have a way to segregate/remove infringing information. Perhaps a first true usecase for crypto/NFT's.