this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

Rust Lang

139 readers
1 users here now

Rules [Developing]

Observe our code of conduct

Constructive criticism only

No endless relitigation

No low-effort content

No memes or image macros

No NSFW Content

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
19
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Kerfuffle to c/[email protected]
 

I recently ran into an issue where I wanted to use Any for slices. However, it only allows 'static types (based on what I read, this is because you get the same TypeId regardless of lifetimes).

I came up with this workaround which I think is safe:

use std::{
    any::{Any, TypeId},
    marker::PhantomData,
};

#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
pub struct AnySlice<'a> {
    tid: TypeId,
    len: usize,
    ptr: *const (),
    marker: PhantomData<&'a ()>,
}

impl<'a> AnySlice<'a> {
    pub fn from_slice(s: &'a [T]) -> Self {
        Self {
            len: s.len(),
            ptr: s.as_ptr() as *const (),
            tid: TypeId::of::(),
            marker: PhantomData,
        }
    }

    pub fn as_slice(&self) -> Option<&'a [T]> {
        if TypeId::of::() != self.tid {
            return None;
        }
        Some(unsafe { std::slice::from_raw_parts(self.ptr as *const T, self.len) })
    }

    pub fn is(&self) -> bool {
        TypeId::of::() == self.tid
    }
}

edit: Unfortunately it seems like Lemmy insists on mangling the code block. See the playground link below.

T: Any ensures T is also 'static. The lifetime is preserved with PhantomData. Here's a playground link with some simple tests and a mut version: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=3116a404c28317c46dbba6ed6824c8a9

It seems to pass Miri, including the mut version (which requires a bit more care to ensure there can only be one mutable reference). Any problems with doing this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Note: both code fragments and links contain things like & which makes them inoperable as is.

[–] Kerfuffle 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Note: both code fragments and links contain things like &

Yes, I know. lemmy mangles stuff like ampersand and less than even inside code blocks. I noted this in an edit for the main post and included a playground link as well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Playground link is mangled as well: I needed to manually replace &s with & to make it load the gist.

[–] Kerfuffle 2 points 1 year ago

Look at your post and you'll see my issue. :)

load more comments (1 replies)