this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
4 points (100.0% liked)
Quark's
1122 readers
43 users here now
Come to Quark’s, Quark’s is Fun!
General off-topic chat for the crew of startrek.website. Trek-adjacent discussions, other sci-fi television, navigating the Fediverse, server meta (within reason), selling expired cases of Yamok sauce, it’s all fair game.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The comments on that article are really strange.
Maybe I'm just not that familiar with how new trek is made, but is this a good thing for trek or more Section 31 stuff?
Deadline is an industry news site, so the comments tend to be filled by people from the industry (or at least claiming to be).
It's real hard to interpret all the corporate jargon, but...I think in the near term, nothing's likely to change. The guy was already overseeing drama, including Star Trek, and is continuing in that role. The new bit seems to be "emphasis on franchise building and leveraging and identifying new and existing IP across broadcast, streaming and other emerging media," which is...vague, but obviously could have implications for Trek. Maybe they'll lean into alternative projects like the Khan podcast series, or that Picard audiobook they did a while back.
And maybe it could involve coordinating with the film division for the next theatrical movie?