this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
123 points (98.4% liked)

Hardware

969 readers
417 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“They already have billions of dollars. […] They did not need money. They needed an incentive. And the incentive is going to be they [do not want to] pay a 25%, 50% or even a 100% tax."

What does he think taxes are. An administrative burden to doge?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He still does not understand how tariffs work. By that statement he honestly thinks that he will take a 25% cut of what is paid to TSMC, rather than the fact that the price of TSMC chips will go up 25%, and that extra 25% has to be paid by an American company.

[–] thatKamGuy 7 points 2 days ago

It’s might be even worse then that; if something costs $1000 currently, with a 25% tariff could it not end up costing 33.3% more ($1,333), so that after the 25% tariff, the value returns to $1000?