this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
480 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60306 readers
2912 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)

Philip K. Dick wrote a short story ("Autofac") in which autonomous, self-replicating factories continue to operate and produce goods long after a global war has wiped out most of humanity, and they eat up all remaining resources on earth in doing so. I worry that there's a system in which a few extremely rich people can continue thriving without involvement of most of humanity, and that they're (knowingly or unknowingly) moving society in that direction. Who needs the commoners when AI and algorithms can simulate them.

IIUC the calculation of GDP doesn't factor in whether the produced goods serve a human need - the system can in theory continue to optimize for ever-increasing GDP while every human on earth starves to death.

[–] hellothere 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Correct; GDP is a dumb measure, and even its inventor said it cannot be used alone.

[–] anomnom 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Yeah we need to be kept employed at around 94% (or at least not 100%) while we starve to death.

[–] taladar 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, technically 100% employment wouldn't be desirable, that would mean nobody can ever switch jobs or take some time off from working to deal with some personal issues or projects.

[–] anomnom 2 points 1 week ago

No it’s that wages climb too much when unemployment is too low. The Feds even fucking said it during the inflation. They wanted a higher unemployment rate. Super fucked unless there was ever a basic income.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I think employment is based on those seeking work. So if you take time off, you wouldn’t be counted. It’s a balance in the market that stops wage rises and inflation when there is unemployment. It’s obviously not desirable for the individual.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)