172
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
172 points (96.2% liked)
Technology
59525 readers
3118 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
1000 qubits? Where? Last time I checked it was 50 qubits for 200ms
Ok, I decided to dive into it today again and look what I've found:
They still demonstrate supremacy to each other proving that their setup couldn't be simulated. These 433 and 1000 qubit processors are good only for one purpose: to simulate itself.
Photonic QC still estimates hafnian billions times faster; if only this mathematical structure appeared to have any practical meaning
They demonstrated that toric codes might be effective