Technology

59979 readers

2715 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

471

Discord says piracy subpoena would violate users’ First Amendment rights (www.theverge.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

94 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Discord defends itself against efforts to stop piracy on its platform by saying no to more invasive data collection. Even though Discord isn’t exactly known for privacy, this is a great move for its users. What are your thoughts?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Like I said, Discord can still be compelled to let feds join the server, thus receiving the PKIs.

[–] fruitycoder 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If the the pki is generated by users client side by a secret discord doesn't control it wouldn't be an issue.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Either you share the message history to new users (which includes feds) or you don't have any history. I don't understand what you mean

[–] fruitycoder 2 points 2 months ago

The server provides the data to authenticated users and helps facilitate pki between the clients.

If someone is added by the server to have access to the data but wasn't given a key capable of decryption by an actual user they wouldn't have actual access, just encrypted data.