this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
1044 points (99.9% liked)

196

16423 readers
1892 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 months ago (14 children)

I think they will just call her "the DEI candidate", which is a few layers isolated from the actual N-word, so they can have some plausible deniability for the moderates, while also signaling to the radicals.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago (11 children)

the DEI candidate

Non American here... Do I even want to know?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Diversity, ~~equality~~ equity, inclusion.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Slight correction: it's equity not equality.

Equality is everyone being treated the same way regardless of differences.

Equity is everyone being provided with the tools they need to succeed taking individual differences into account.

This is the goal, whether or not it succeeds depends on how it's implemented.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the correction. I'm also not American. Edited the post.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Equality is everyone being treated the same way regardless of differences.

Generally, equality is just about equality of freedom or "power to –". If someone needs support to achieve their goals (as long as this doesn't involve "power over" others / oppression) then of course it is important that there be societal structures/networks in place to help them, or at least "meta-structures" that can facilitate the organisation of such supporting networks.

Of course, "freedom" is a poorly defined word in itself, but imo the "everyone treated the exact same" (or worse, "everyone should be the same") interpretations are not in the spirit of "freedom" and I wouldn't be surprised if they were constructed in bad faith (not to promote "equity" but to discredit "equality").

But ultimately it's just semantics, and if you like calling it equity that's cool, it's just good to keep in mind that people who still use "equality" can easily be referring to the exact same thing.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes they can be referring to the same thing, but the "E" in "DEI" stands for "equity", not "equality". I made no value judgments on either term, I just explained the difference.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

That sounds like a compliment then

Is that really a fucking bad thing for these

[–] 31337 10 points 3 months ago

Yep. There's a whole propaganda industry that rails against it (Prager U, Daily Wire, Red pillers, etc), and right-wing states are banning Universities from engaging in it, and banning investment of state funds in companies that take DEI into account (even though it's pretty much just corporate lip-service).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Bill Ackmann (a 9 bn dollar heavy reptiloid billionaire) posted a lengthy rant against it on that birdsite and our lord and saviour Elmo concurred and proclaimed that it's racist, immoral and illegal although similar programs were already in place since 1964 in the USA.

MAGAs regularly claim that it's the fault of DEI when something goes south, e.g. Boeing machines failing, the CrowdStrike thingy, the bridge crash in Baltimore or Harris getting to the position she's now in.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)