this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7078 readers
1041 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Whoa, meeting with manufacturers? We're getting new subs, not somebody else's obsolete garbage?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (4 children)

As far as I can tell the KSS-III class of subs from ROK would be the frontrunner. Last year Babcock, the company that provides maintenance for our current subs, signed a contract to cooperate on the deal with Hanwa Ocean. It's one of the best conventional subs, it has 6xVLS with the next block stretched and supposed to feature 10xVLS. Also, it's in production, which could mean relatively quick turnaround once they were ordered. The fact that it can deploy the Hyunmoo 4-4 ballistic missile is also a pretty big deal. If Canada were to be faced with a hypothetical scenario of a powerful belligerent dictatorship, stealthy submarines with ballistic missiles could provide interesting options for credible deterrence.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Very cool. Korea 's MIC is absolutely killing it lately. It'll be interesting to see their role on the global stage once most countries have taken delivery (like Poland's absurdly large order for tanks)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Pretty sure Poland got a deal to manufacture them in Poland. They want to make their own industry too.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)