this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
68 points (86.2% liked)

History

77 readers
1 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The uncomfortable truth is that for Nazism’s spell over the German people to be broken, it had to run its bloody course; it had to be seen to fail – utterly, completely and catastrophically. For all its heroism, Stauffenberg’s plot risked preventing that. So, while we applaud it, we should also applaud its failure.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So it's OK that a couple if million people died because of some moral hazard argument? Yeah right.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

I'm assuming you think a replacement to Hitler would have stopped the war. First, is that what you believe?

Second, would a more effective leader of Nazi Germany ultimately cause more deaths?