195
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Are we Wayland yet? Are we JPEGXL yet? Are we Rust yet?

I’ve gathered a meta-tracker for the adoption state of futuristic technologies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

What exactly is the advantage of codeberg over gitlab and github? People just say "miscellaneous privacy benefits"

[-] [email protected] 33 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Using free software to create free software is already a good reason.

But if you need more:

  • owned by Microsoft, it is a US-based megacorporate product with value to deliver to shareholders first
  • never forget EEE as we see a new form of it with Microsoft trying to control the entire developer experience from the server hosting to the editor/AI on folks’ machines; under-litigation Copilot is a straight exploitation of the Commons selling our hardwork back to us
  • proprietary means you can’t fork or fix the numerous bugs in the platform nor is there a real issue tracker so you beg on their forums for fixes (anti-free software mentality)
  • lock-in issues since aside from specifically the Git part, every one of those proprietary features you buy into will dig a further trench to make it hard to migrate elsewhere
  • yes, privacy benefits of not just you but all potential contributors as well since it is a locked ecosystem that requires an account
  • not everyone thinks software forges should double as a social media platform with upvotes, FOMO, commit anxiety with employers imploring you have metrics on a closed platform with knock-on issues like star-hacking where projects try to inflate their star numbers in this popularity contest instead of judging projects on merit
  • related, the README used to be a file you could read without rendering but now instead they are full of trash markup, emoji, & the repository is filled with binary blobs of images or worse videos for your demo ballooing cloning all wrapped in a Microsoft UI not your own; setting up a separate site isn’t hard (nor is it easy either) but at least you get to own your look & keep assets out of your repository
  • there are literally ads & upsells all over the platform
  • you can’t use search or see the collapsed comments without authentication
  • censorship is not uncommon--especially when it mess with the corporate status quo (see Nintendo Switch emulator dev, youtube-dl, etc.)
  • being US-based & big enough for scrutiny, MS GitHub is required to follow US sanctions which prohibit some of your potential users/contributors from even accessing your code (and/or issue tracker and/or forum and/or wiki and/or donations if using MS GitHub)
  • …& there already is a host of good alternatives out there for code forges with better performance & features, some of them aren’t locked to Git either; ‘network effect’ be damned
[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

So, everything you mentioned are reasons I've heard for people to switch from GitHub to GitLab, which is why I explicitly mentioned them both in the question.

So far no one has given me any advantage specific to codeberg. (Keeping in mind that GitLab is already open source, self-hosted, and federated via ActivityPub).

[-] skulbuny 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

GitLab isn't open source, and certainly isn't an open project first — they have a sales team, a marketing team, and a budget who does not account for getting new dev users

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
195 points (98.0% liked)

Linux

45523 readers
2164 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS