Technology

61774 readers

4116 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1026

Court Bans Use of 'AI-Enhanced' Video Evidence Because That's Not How AI Works (gizmodo.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

241 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A judge in Washington state has blocked video evidence that’s been “AI-enhanced” from being submitted in a triple murder trial. And that’s a good thing, given the fact that too many people seem to think applying an AI filter can give them access to secret visual data.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 122 points 10 months ago (46 children)

I think we need to STOP calling it "Artificial Intelligence". IMHO that is a VERY misleading name. I do not consider guided pattern recognition to be intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You, and humans in general, are also just sophisticated pattern recognition and matching machines. If neural networks are not intelligent, then you are not intelligent.

[–] Chakravanti -1 points 10 months ago

You can say what you like but absolutely zero true and full understand of what human intelligence actually is or how it works.

"AI", or whatever you want to call it, is not at all similar.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (44 replies)