It’s always the “but” that gets you. There you are, hurtling through the start of the sentence, making all the right points, saying all the necessary things, conveying all that needs to be conveyed, and then, Bam!, out comes that pesky coordinating conjunction that ruins the exercise in an instant. In her revolting statement on the assassination of Brian Thompson, the former CEO of UnitedHealthcare, Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts fell prey to this trap. “Violence is never the answer,” Warren said. “But,” she continued, “people can only be pushed so far.”

Ah.

As one might have augured, Warren’s “but” was the overture to a catastrophic series of statements that, taken together, rendered all that came before them entirely moot. The killing represented “a warning,” Warren suggested, “that if you push people hard enough they lose faith in the ability of their government to make change, lose faith in the ability of the people who are providing the health care to make change, and start to take matters into their own hands in ways that will ultimately be a threat to everyone.”

There’s a word for this sort of argument in the expansive English language. That word is “justification.”

Contrast Warren’s words with those from her fellow Democratic senator, John Fetterman of Pennsylvania. About the murderer, Fetterman said, “He’s the asshole that’s going to die in prison.” About those celebrating him online, Fetterman said, “A sewer is going to sewer: that’s what social media is about.” About the mainstream press’s sympathetic takes, Fetterman said, “I don’t know why the media wants to turn that into a story, just with these trolls saying these kinds of things anonymously like that.” His conclusion was perfect: “Remember,” Fetterman advised, “he has two children that are going to grow up without their father. It’s vile. And if you’ve gunned someone down that you don’t happen to agree with their views or the business that they’re in, hey, you know, I’m next, they’re next, he’s next, she’s next.”

Americans seeking good examples should resolve to be a Fetterman rather than a Warren.

http://archive.today/2024.12.12-070218/https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/12/elizabeth-warren-is-a-disaster-for-the-democrats/

He speaks like a cartoon villain in a kid's TV show yet thinks it's everyone else who needs to grow the hell up.

EDIT: APPARENTLY THIS IS NOT A REAL TWEET. I fell for it and reposted it, sorry for the misinformation!

This article is a critique of Monbiot’s recent interview with Chris Hedges: The Secret History of Neoliberalism 📺

Hedges is also critical of capitalism, but, being an incorrigible liberal trapped in capitalist realism, the best he can imagine is worker coops or every person being their own petty bourgeois shopkeeper.

While beneficial to consumers who are able to take advantage, for example by charging an electric car or running appliances, it also threatens to undermine the viability of Europe's renewable energy projects, which are critical to hitting net zero targets.

"It's akin to a hara-kiri," said Bjarne Schieldrop, chief commodities analyst at Swedish lender SEB "Everyone knows that if you produce too much oil, the price will crash and producers lose money. And there's nothing different in renewable energy and power either."

I almost can't believe the absolute shitiness of this. I suppose the implication is why would producers build power stations (no doubt with govt. subsidises!) if they can't make a profit!

cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/1469056

Good video, from what I can tell.

Only 13 minutes or so.

Maybe watch in picture mode while doing other things.

Your thoughts?

Oh look! Once again mentioning the Paris Agreement and climate change and sustainability and making it seem like it's the sole responsibility of the commoners and not aristocracy! Hey, Vogue, news flash: Joe Cashier or Jane Officeworker owning an extra shirt or two isn't what's pushing the Earth over the edge, and it's not even a rounding error compared to the lifestyles of the celebrities you constantly glorify!

Yeah, fun fact, Elon bought into his position as head of Tesla. He is not the founder.

I've read this article three times and I have no idea what it even means. I'm also pretty sure it'd get an F if it was a high school essay.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/458932

As an ecology major: maybe don't try comparing human society to ecology. Ecology is a really fucked up system if you really think about it with organisms constantly trying to eat or starve each other and dying as horribly and with as much suffering as they lived. Is that what we want in our society of intelligent, logical creatures? Plenty of other animals gave figured this out and formed cooperative social groups where individuals do things with the explicit intent to benefit the collective, why can't humans?

Consult Maslow's Pyramid. If you can't afford to feed yourself or your family, don't have stable housing, clean water, or social mobility, chances are "but you're so diverse!" isn't a consolation in your eyes.

Finally, the issue with rich (human) places being less diverse is entirely the fault of capitalism favouring the richest, and colonialism destroying the existing cultures. It's absolutely not caused by simply having more resources. Which, what the hell are they going on about rich places (their implication being the US and Canada) having existed for not that long? No no, it existed for ages, but y'all killed all the indigenous people and installed a fake culture on it and are pretending that it was the first one. Also, what about Western Europe? It's existed for ages too, yet is about as (un)diverse as the US or Canada with each country basically being its own ethnostate. In fact, the US and Canada are more diverse than most Western European countries due to having more immigrants.