1
25
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/14265279

The upward intonation, the guttural “ck” and even the cheeky comeback to win the argument: at just 19 months old, baby Orla has mastered the crucial elements of speaking like a scouser.

Impressively, the toddler who featured in a viral video this week appears to have done so without the need for actual words.

A clip posted on TikTok, and now viewed more than 20m times, shows Orla babbling in a Liverpudlian accent as her babysitter, Olayka, tries and fails to coax her into taking a nap. Scientists say that the cute exchange is also a vivid illustration of the processes by which babies acquire language – and the surprising role of accents.

Babies are so tuned in to the musical ups and downs of speech that even as newborns they cry in distinctive ways that reflect the languages that they have heard while in the womb.

In one 2009 study, Prof Kathleen Wermke, a pioneer in the field of speech development at the Würzburg University in Germany, found that French infants tend to wail on a rising note and German babies favour a falling melody and other patterns have been seen for Mandarin, Swedish and African languages. “When I started 40 years ago, if I told people I was recording babies crying and making high-pitched sounds they’d look at you and think ‘Is this really science?’,” she said.

2
18
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
3
79
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

I'm sharing this here mostly due to the alphabet. The relevant region (Tartessos) would be roughly what's today the western parts of Andalucia, plus the Algarve.

Here are the news in Spanish, for anyone interested.

The number of letters is specially relevant for me - 32 letters. The writing system is a redundant alphabet, where you use different graphemes for the stops, depending on the next vowel; and it was likely made for a language with five vowels, so you had five letters for /p/, five for /t/, five for /k/. Counting the "bare" vowels this yields 20 letters; /m n s r l/ fit well with that phonology, but what about the other seven?

4
30
submitted 4 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
5
8
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6
84
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/15125500

xkcd #2942: Fluid Speech

https://xkcd.com/2942

explainxkcd.com for #2942

Alt text:

Thank you to linguist Gretchen McCulloch for teaching me about phonetic assimilation, and for teaching me that if you stand around in public reading texts from a linguist and murmuring example phrases to yourself, people will eventually ask if you're okay.

7
13
submitted 1 month ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8
14
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
9
0
sand (packaged-media.redd.it)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
10
48
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11
58
cli-etymology (mander.xyz)
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12
21
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
13
14
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
14
38
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
15
23
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
16
145
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

they were taking part in an unusual experiment, which involved tracking their own voices over time. This was done by making 10-minute recordings every few weeks. They would sit in front of a microphone and repeat the same 29 words as they appeared on a computer screen. Food. Coffee. Hid. Airflow.

One of those changes was the "ou" sound in words such as "flow" and "sew" that shifted towards the front of the vocal tract.

I'm not actually sure what sound change they're describing there. Can anyone explain with examples or IPA?

edit: Cheers for the answers (turns out I misunderstood which part is the vocal tract)

17
13
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
18
7
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
19
45
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
20
72
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This is not bad

21
63
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22
21
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
23
9
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
24
45
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
25
71
Duolingo Sucks, Now What?: A Guide (ruhua-langblr.tumblr.com)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
view more: next ›

Linguistics

380 readers
9 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

  1. Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
  2. Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
  3. Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
  4. Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS