I'm intrigued by his Not Guilty plea for escaping custody when he was previously in custody, and then found to have escaped it. I don't know much about legal procedures, but that does seem quite bold.
this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023
7 points (76.9% liked)
United Kingdom
4077 readers
309 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
He's got absolutely no reason to plead guilty. He's not going to get a lighter sentence so he might as well cost them as much as possible by forcing a trial, and extending the news coverage of this embarrassing story.
Not a fan of the guy or his ideology but, from his perspective, this makes perfect sense.
It’s like obviously guilty people appealing their sentence: they have a right to do so and as such their solicitor will recommend that they do it. There’s almost no chance of them getting their sentence overturned or reduced, but you don’t ask, you don’t get.
Why wouldn't he get a lighter sentence for a guilty plea?
Because they're going to throw the book at him regardless now.
He may also disagree with the "lawfully detained" bit of the charge, given that he has pleaded not guilty to the original charges he was due to stand trial for. But he doesn't really have anything to lose either way. There are screaming tabloids on the case now, he might as well spin it out.
I'd have thought they'd want less fuss, so would offer him a deal...but you're right, I don't think he'd accept anyway. The media circus is all he's got.
This is the UK. We don't do plea bargains. There are sentencing guidelines which include giving credit for an early guilty plea but, in this case, I doubt it will make much difference to whatever sentence he eventually gets.
Thanks. If he reveals himself to be a performance artist, I'd be genuinely impressed
Maybe he somehow fell and got stuck under the truck, and then got lost on his way back to the prison?
As far as I know you can enter a not guilty plea regardless of the circumstances. Maybe he wants to appear a martyr, and use the resulting trial to attract attention.
I want him to win just to see the bold story that someone made him not guilt.
It would need to be fantastic and I want to see that.
Proper Bart Simpson energy
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The former soldier Daniel Khalife has pleaded not guilty at the Old Bailey in London to escaping from HMP Wandsworth, where he was on remand after being charged with terrorism offences earlier this year.
He is accused of escaping from prison on 6 September by allegedly strapping himself to the underside of a food delivery vehicle.
Khalife was arrested on a canal towpath in west London at 10.41am on 9 September after being pulled off a push bike by a plainclothes counter-terrorism officer.
He had been in Wandsworth prison awaiting trial after allegedly planting a fake bomb at an RAF base and gathering information that might be useful to terrorists or enemies of the UK.
Mr Justice Jeremy Baker joined the charges and Khalife will be tried at Woolwich crown court on 13 November for all four offences.
He will reappear at the Old Bailey for a review hearing on 13 October, when the trial date may be discussed.
The original article contains 204 words, the summary contains 159 words. Saved 22%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!