this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
567 points (97.6% liked)

memes

9852 readers
3877 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

The exception is if it's open source and can save thousands of people two seconds.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Doesn't even have to be the case. A 2min task done every (work)day, takes up a bit over 7 hours/year. After 2½ years it will be a benefit to have automated it!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago

The benefit of automating is really measured in hair loss and extra time to grab another coffee.

[–] ryathal 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Only if the requirements stay the same for 2.5 years. Otherwise there's probably another week of time trying to update the initial work, then just throwing it away and making a new solution that's theoretically easier to update.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If changing requirements mean you need to update the script, then updating the script is part of your job. QED. I don't see the problem with a little job security.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, just add it to the 'amount of work you are putting'.

When setting up git hooks for my project, I looked at other's OSS hooks first. That shaved off significant hours off of my Research.

load more comments (2 replies)