that seems like a pretty flimsy case? i'm not doubting what you saw firsthand, but a single eyewitness account is hardly grounds to make a claim on all marijuana use, especially when there's a fair amount of research suggesting otherwise
that seems like a pretty flimsy case? i'm not doubting what you saw firsthand, but a single eyewitness account is hardly grounds to make a claim on all marijuana use, especially when there's a fair amount of research suggesting otherwise