I get that and i bough baldurs gate full price on release, but as the games start creeping up past 70 to like 100, it's like for what? I can just not spend this money. It's not like a car i need to get to work and car prices were skyhigh last summer and fall for example, or food, etc. If gaming companies cant compete on wages with other tech businesses that need programmers, they're just gonna have to make do with less manpower. Long winded way of saying inelastic market.
Bluescluestoothpaste
joined 1 year ago
Yeah but there were admins spying what you did and banning you. Quite frankly i have much greater trust in AI admins than human admins. Not that some human admins aren't great, but why risk it? Same as self driven cars, as soon as they're ready im ready to never drive again.
It's not unreasonable but at the end of the day, we buy these games to waste time. There's not a whole lot of justifying why im going to spend more on something i use to just unwind when i can buy plenty of 20$ games that will give me hundreds of hours of entertainment
Because you submitted a top level response, not a reply to any comment
I thought this article is about BG3, wtf are you talking about?
Lol i moved to the suburbs for myself and yes it's way better than living in the city.
Kill me right now if that's my future lmao
I just do whatever's easiest -- just signing up for some of these services takes way too long to watch one 2 hour program. The money's not an issue at all in my mind, im happy to pay $70 for baldurs gate 3 with a dedicated download server and installation package. But im not willing to spend half an hour downloading and installing some streaming service.
They've forecasted all this, global population is expected to peak around 2085 and then shrink slightly and flatten around 2100 at like 11B. Idk google it it's qll super well documented stuff.
It confirms the redshift, but scientists have no way of knowing that it's caused by the doppler effect, they just assume it is.
Rather, the standard model is not fully understood and light redshifts naturally over great distances due to losing energy to gravity waves, but that implies photons have mass which violates the standard model.
Maybe im crazy, but i think it's a lot more likely the standard model is not correct with regard to photon mass as opposed to there's an exotic force that violates conservation of mass/energy. I suppose either is quite incredible. I just refuse to assume the universe is accelarating expansion for seemingly no reason. And if photons are affected by gravitational fields, it makes perfect sense they have some reactive effect on gravity as well.
Totally agree, just frustrating to try to communicate with people who say they are pro-business and rational, and then they vehemently make emotional moral/spiritual arguments.
Sure, and they can have AI moderators in lemmy instances. Whatever problems are concerning about corporate AI admins also apply to corporate human admins.