this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
1387 points (94.9% liked)

Science Memes

11253 readers
2779 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 189 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Budget: Military Complex > CERN

Long term value to citizens: CERN > Miltary Complex

All historical CERN expenses combined are a tiny fraction of the yearly expenses of the combined EU miltary

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But particles don't make my dick feel big

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even quarks aren't that small.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They call me quark cause I'm always down to top and up to bottom and I'm charmingly strange. Also I'm very very small

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

US Congress: Audit NASA > Audit the Pentagon

EU: Audit CERN > Audit Luxemborg/Malta/~~UK~~

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 177 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Guys, the trick is to get it partially built and then cancel funding. Then scientists will never trust you to fund anything ever again, and you get to act like science is a waste of money while you're spending ridiculous sums on fighter jets.

Yes, I am still bitter about Waxahatchie.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)
[–] JohnDClay 25 points 1 year ago

He's a great video documentary about it by Bobby Broccoli if you want information and have two hours.

https://youtu.be/3xSUwgg1L4g

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 126 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is cheaper than two super carriers.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but how many brown children can it kill?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you ask the scientists in my local Facebook group, it could kill all of them. That is, the ones not already killed by vaccines and 5G.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

The feds give the states more than $16b per year to build and run shitty, custom made IT systems for their Medicaid programs. It's basically a subsidy to IT companies. There are thousands of examples like this, where spending money on fundamental science is clearly a better investment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Fun fact, they were going to build one in the US crossing the borders of LA, TX, AR. They even dug out the damn hole, but they shit canned the whole project so now we're just left with a random giant circular hole underground.

Edited AK to AR. That would have been a bit excessive.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not quite circular, they only got 26% of the tunnel dug. Still, 23 km is quite a long tunnel to leave sitting empty

[–] vaultdweller013 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fill it with cheese. Make another cheese vault. We require the cheese. Government cheese. Cheese.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think I saw this in an anime once. Something to do with a big Philosopher Stone or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

There's an excellent documentation by BobbyBroccoli about that.

https://youtu.be/3xSUwgg1L4g

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (20 children)

i hope someday we construct a collider that spans the entire circumference of the earth. But we'd probably have to build one that spans the circumference of the moon first, and then maybe mars, since the oceans are going to be a bit of a doozie to work around that we don't have the technology for, whereas the interior of a collider is supposed to be evacuated, so, the moon almost kinda already handles that for us. heat might be an issue of course, but if we can figure out thermal radiator panels that can dump the heat straight into space, maybe we could pull it off...

mars would address the heat issues, but those dust storms are no joke and the dust itself is microscopic toxic/caustic razors and it'll try to get in everywhere and ruin fine instruments it touches. Moon dust is also really bad but there's no wind to kick it up on the moon obviously...

but damn. DAMN. imagine the fucking science we could get done with a LUNAR-SCALE PARTICLE COLLIDER!!!

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Halo

Just gonna throw that out there

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck it, orbital collider. Earth deserves a cool ring

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 63 points 1 year ago

Remember when people were worried about these killing us all by creating a black hole that swallows the Earth?

Can this one just hurry up and do that please?

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

Imagine if only 1/10 of all countries ~~GDP~~ gouvernement spending went to scientists and the patent bullshit didn't exist ? We'd be mining asteroids and sipping coffee on Mars.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd rather spend 22 billion on this than in Israel or more weapons of war

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

I'd rather spend money on science than killing innocent people.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

When I look at the inability to fund big science projects like this, I'm reminded of the most fictional thing to ever happen in a science fiction movie.

The film? Contact.

They build a giant portal machine thing.

Gets blowed up by terrorists.

But that's okay, because they've got another one!

What?

Yep!

"Why build one when you can build two for twice the price?"

FALSE. SUSPENSION OF DISBELIEF FAILURE. ABORT.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How about one that goes around the circumference of the Earth? That would be boss.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Just go full Dyson Ring and have one in space around the sun, can even use all the surface area to power it with solar panels.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

STOP ACCELERATING PARTICLES! Years of research and no use found for particles any smaller than SAND!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry bro, we spent the 22 billion on the genocide budget.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

We need this one to undo the timeline shift the last one caused

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (6 children)

But how will it be called? "Even larger Hadron Collider"?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

QUARK

Quantum

Universe

Advanced

Research

Komplex!!

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

Collidy Mc Collideface

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›