this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
1172 points (98.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54803 readers
666 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

If I controlled a paper, I’d force a git control system with publicly viewable edits made after publication.

Imagine the goodwill and trust that would instill in the public toward your paper.

Edit: I’ve thought the same thing about proposed legislation for a long time.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think many have also been wondering about version control of legislation/law documents for some time as well. But I never understand why it’s not realized yet.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because the people who would implement that system would be the same people it would hold to account.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Probably because companies don't want to be held accountable.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

a git control system

And be able to actually be held responsible for your actions? You're crazy!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Le-git-slation for the win!

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely impressed by this being upvoted here. Big tech and powerful corporate/government interests are destroying our societies. This information needs to be checked and tracked.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I assumed the piracy sub would be a safe space for this sort of thing

[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Piracy is data preservation after all. How many books, series, TV shows, and video games would be inaccessible if not for pirated copies?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] SailorMoss 6 points 1 year ago

Well how do you do fellow Jacob Geller fan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Definitely can't rely on companies to archive their own stuff effectively.

[–] [email protected] 91 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Maybe it is out there, but the Internet Archive should be wildly redundant on the internet, it's just too valuable to lose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This article sent my down a Brewster Kahle rabbit hole, so...

Who remembers when Alexa was simply a web traffic rating site? I forgot that Amazon named it's assistant after that property.

[–] can 21 points 1 year ago

holy shit

How have I never connected those dots?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Alexa used to be a great marketing tool before Amazon got their grubby meathooks on it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

When I tried to open this article about the importance of allowing bots to archive content, I got this "Robot Challenge Screen":

😭

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm all for taking molotovs and whatever else we can manage to scrounge up to bring the heat to any company who opposes the Internet Archive. I'm willing to perform terroristic acts to show these people that we care about our digital freedom.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe a little soon bro.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nekothegamer 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

this article is 7 years old lol

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It came out yesterday. You are probably looking at the date on the screenshot of an article that it starts with rather than the date of this article at the top.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›