This could be a potentially big deal in regards to investigating Grusch's claims and transparency as a whole. I'm hoping they are able to elect a speaker that is pro UAP transparency.
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
7 points (76.9% liked)
UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs
1248 readers
1 users here now
A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.
New to Lemmy?
See the Getting Started Guide
Want Disclosure?
Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.
Community Spotlight
Featured Posts and User Investigations
Useful Links
- UAP Guide
- Disclosure Diaries
- UAP Timeline
- UFOs Wiki
- MUFON - Mutual UFO Network
- Investigate a Sighting
- Report a Sighting
Community Rules
- Follow the Code of Conduct.
- Posts must be on-topic.
- No duplicate posts.
- No commercial activity.
- No memes.
- Titles must accurately represent the content of the submission.
- Link posts must include a submission statement (comment on your own post).
- Common Question posts must include a link to the previous question thread if previously asked.
- Low effort, toxic comments regarding public figures may be removed.
- Off-topic political discussion may be removed at moderator discretion.
Other Communities
If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Given that Burchett was one of the Republicans to vote McCarthy out, he’ll likely have some more sway on who will make the cut for the new speaker. Along with Gaetz’s opinions on disclosure there could be more leverage to the UAP cause. Though, I’m expecting Republican infighting to stall the new vote.
That's my hope as well.
I was under the impression that the whole uap thing was a distraction for something.