this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
60 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43989 readers
622 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What I think could make Lemmy superior to Reddit is the ability to create themed-instances that are all linked together which feels like the entire point. I've noticed that a lot of instances are trying to be a catch-all Reddit replacement by imitating specific subs which is understandable given the circumstances but seems like it's not taking advantage of the full power that Lemmy could have.

Imagine for a moment that instances were more focus-based. Instead of having communities that are all mostly unrelated we had entire instances that are focused on one specific area of expertise or interest. Imagine a LOTR instance that had many sub-communities (in this case "communities" would be the wrong way to look at it, it would be more like categories) that dealt with different subjects in the LOTR universe: books, movies, lore, gaming, art, etc all in the same instance.

Imagine the types of instances that could be created with more granular categories within to better guide conversations: Baseball, Cars, Comics, Movies, Tech etc.

A tech instance could have dedicated communities for news, programming, dev, IT, Microsoft, Apple, iOS, linux. Or you could make it even more granular by having a dedicated instance for each of those because there's so many categories that could be applied to each.

What are your thoughts?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the main point of decentralization is to spread the burden of hosting around so that no individual has control of the system. I think having themed servers like what you're suggesting would aid in discoverability of different communities, but the downside is that that would mean individual servers would have monopolies on certain subjects.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Also, people might not want their handle being associated with a specific niche hobby they have, though they might be there a lot/all the time (e.g. I don't want to be "ewe@hentainsfw", but I sure as shit am going to be spending a lot of time there).

I kind of feel like it would be best if we had some "user" instances that are nice and always up and most of the communities lived on "community" instances either grouped or just spread out. That way if any single community gets too big on an instance, it doesn't necessarily bog a bunch of users down as well (e.g. all the users on lemmy.ml that are hamstrung by being on the overloaded hardware on that instance).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hopping between instances would have to be simplified significantly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm currently working on a Lemmy mobile client and have implemented multi-accounts until it's easier to do this. Basically you can make multiple accounts on different instances and aggregate the data from them all into a single feed. It doesn't currently prioritize posting from specific accounts (you just select a primary)--I'm trying to figure out a good way to go about doing it so you can section things off πŸ‘€

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do you need multiple accounts on different instances. You can have an account join a community on a different instance.

[–] socialjusticewizard 3 points 1 year ago

Same reason people have multiple accounts on other sites. You don't always want your comments on local news to intersect your comments in a professional community or your comments on a game site. Storing them on other instances is another small layer of security.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] feduser934 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand what you mean. Isn't the point of federation that one account on one instance is as good as an account on every instance? I've never felt the need to hop between instances.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

OP's post is about having specialized instances, making hopping around necessary. It's not convenient enough as it is.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Making specialized instances does not in any way make hopping around necessary. If you join a specialized instance that doesn't already sub to the communities you want, you just add them.

Example: I join a Star Trek themed instance that has a bunch of locally created star trek communities. I want to sub to all those, but i ALSO want to sub to the homelab community on beehaw. I just subscribe to [email protected] FROM the star trek instance I am a member of. That star trek instance will then start syncing the homelab content from beehaw and you can read and reply from the star trek instance.

Conversely, if someone has an account on beehaw.org and they want to read a star trek community based on that star trek instance, they just need to sub to it FROM beehaw.org.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] feduser934 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By hopping around, do you mean changing your account to one on another instance, or viewing a list of communities on an instance, or something else?

I don't feel that changing accounts is necessary because of the magic of federation. But I don't know how to view a list of communities in an instance without leaving your home instance. That would be a cool feature, but is only really important when you're initially picking all your subscriptions.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Exactly, it's really inconvenient right now. And it's really important for the usability of what OP suggested.

If I simply link to a cool community I found, like https://beehaw.org/c/programming, you can't follow that link conveniently if you're from another instance.

And I highly disagree with only being important at the start. It's a big hurdle that stifles growth right now and in the future.

[–] this 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Agreed, what needs to happen is an option that allows users to follow links from foreign instances in their home instance seamlessly. I have to imagine with the ramped up amount of development in lemmy that some of the devs must be working on it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can definitely sub to external communities from a separate instance, I have a bunch from Lemmy.ml show up in my world feed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I never claimed otherwise.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes you can subscribe to and read/reply to that community from any lemmy instance. You just need to add it if the instance doesn't already federate with it.

Go to 'Communities' at the top of your instance homepage then in the search bar put the url of the community you want to add. (example: https://beehaw.org/c/programming)

This next part is undocumented, and might just be a bug. But this is the magic part.

On the next page, change the top search dropdown from Communities to All.

You will see the community you want to sub to in the results. It will say something like.

[email protected] - 0 subscribers

Click it, then on the top right pane click "Subscribe"

Done

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t know how to view a list of communities in an instance without leaving your home instance.

On lemmy:

  1. Click 'Communities' (top left menu)
  2. Search using the search box (top right)
  3. Select 'Communities' from the drop down (top left)
  4. Make sure to toggle 'All' (*not *'Subscribed' or 'Local').

This will show you communities matching your search term from all instances*.

You can then subscribe to communities regardless on which instance they live and use them seemlessly, regardless of wether they are local or not.


*) It will show you communities matching your search term from all instances, if your instance has already discovered that community.

If it has not, it shows 'No Results'. You can force it by some exclamation mark shenanigans which I haven't understood well enough to explain. After that, your instance knows about that community in the other instance and will show it in future search results. I think as soon as one person from your instance force-discovers a community from another instance, that community becomes searchable for everyone on your instance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Having the ability to link your account to different instances might be a way to solve that, or you have the ability to keep accounts separate depending on the instance. Right now we can link specific communities from other instances to another instance which is great, but being able to switch instances easily from one master account would be pretty great

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

@_finger_
We can have both generic instances and instances around a particular topic.

We already have a few lemmy dedicated to a particular community like latte.isnot.coffee and startrek.website

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it will more of less follow that path naturally in the years to come, if it ever catches on. You can already see this happening with some instances (ie lemmy.ca mostly devoted to canadian topics, etc)

You have to remember that the amount of lemmy servers exploded in the past week or so. We're pretty much figuring this out collectively

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

waveform.social is handling a lot of music-making topics. I think this is better than simply being region based. I understand the need for communities of different languages but I don’t really understand the need for ones specific to different english-speaking regions. Instances based on similar interests makes the most sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I don’t really understand the need for ones specific to different english-speaking regions

Makes perfect sense for regional events. This can be anything like weather, disasters, military excercises, cultural or sports events, regional politics, infrastructure projects, astronomy ...

On my local subreddit, I was able to check what that noise was that I just heard, where all the emergency vehicles are racing towards, or follow hilarious regional stories.

Of course, for non-regional topics like music (unless it's a regional event) I'd go to a non-regional sub or community.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It may make a difference in speed if you are closer to the actual server (IE, it's in your country)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't agree. If I like LOTR and giraffes I don't want to create an account on both "instance groups". I want to do like today and create a single account, then subscribe to the communities I am interested in wherever they are.

To me it sounds like you are sort of mixing up community location and community discovery. This is sort of the case right now because instances have a list of local communities but I think that it is best that they are separated. For example on Reddit I don't generally find new communities by scanning the entire list of communities. I usually find them when someone mentions a related community in a comment of a community that I am already in. Or when I stumble across a community when searching the web. When you discover and subscribe to communities this way it doesn't really matter where they are hosted or if they are grouped. You can organically discover things that interest you over time (although I agree that it can be a bit slow to start).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I like LOTR and giraffes I don’t want to create an account on both β€œinstance groups”.

But you don't have to create accounts on multiple instances. You can subscribe, post, and mod communities on other federated servers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Then what happens when the owner of the giraffe instance goes all Spez on us?

Too much control is a bad thing. Let people spread those communities across all instances, otherwise I'll be asking:

How am I to live without my giraffes?!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You can subscribe and post on different instances. But, I don't think all pertinent communities should be on one CENTRALIZED instance since that defeats the point of the Fediverse.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is good but at the moment the user base isn't big enough to support splitting interests like that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My thoughts are what if the instance admins or mods are pricks? What if the instance shuts down?

I think the power of the fediverse is that there is redundancy with the communities on different instances. I feel like it's a very human need to have everything neatly organized and in its place, but the internet is all about redundancy to ensure no single points of failure.

The fediverse mimics that by creating a web of small related communities, spread out over multiple instances, ran by different people, rather than a giant single community for one thing, on one instance, run by one person.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This was the case with Reddit as well, there were a lot of competing subs created due to shitty mods and rules so I don't think it'd be much different in this case

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There was a r/Yankees subreddit that had awful mods, so some people created r/Nyyankees and basically everyone moved there.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I guess it's the point of the fediverse as far as I understand. Kind of like being members of a bunch of old school forums. Unfortunately for me it's not really what I'm looking for, and I like the unified aspect of reddit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

unified is nice, but if i've learnt anything over the past 9-10 years as a redditor, it means you're at the mercy of admins and power mods. And because it's become the go-to forum, it's gotten so much attention from stealth marketers and bots (it's hard not to unsee such posts once you learn to identify them), and karma whores trying to get the first witty remark in so it'll get boosted up into the first top-level comment.

I kinda like the idea of a fediverse - it's like a bunch of forums, but connected in a way that makes it so much easier to browse and read all of them, and doesn't have the "centralisation of power" problem reddit has.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There's nothing stopping you as a user from subbing to different communities on all of those instances to get a feed exactly how you like it.

The only difference would be that mods would belong to an instance themed around their interest with a like-minded admin for it. Also, you could pick more niche topics than you can now. Let's say I'm into tech, but I don't care about AI. I could go to the Tech themed instance, pick the news and linux communities from there, sub to those and get them in my feed while ignoring the ai related communities.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would be nice if it was "divided" by user types too. Imagine a post about a new Marvel movie and you could view a shared comment thread but also filter to remove "marvel-fans", or see only "cineasts", without leaving the thread. Could lead to more bubbles, but could also make it really easy to see what other bubbles are thinking.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Would they give the ability to categorize or stereotype your own account? That could get messy ha

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with what you're saying. I've been contemplating back and forth about whether I should create a board game instant where you gather various board game discussions in the same instant.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think it's worth a try to see what happens, the concern of giving too much power to one instance for one topic is definitely valid but there's also a benefit to it as well. Maybe Im looking at it wrong, in that the accounts are separated for each instance so for example if I wanted to only see posts from your board game instance I'd need to switch accounts rather than add all the communities to my .world instance which could get messy and not preferable in some cases. What might make it more effective and granular is the ability to add multiple categories or topic sections in your instance. For instance if you created a board games community in Lemmy.world there's no ability to do this aside from creating separate communities for each subcategory of niche interests. So instead of being able to create Lemmy.world/boardgames/StarWars or Lemmy.world/boardgames/LOTR you have to create Lemmy.world/starwarsboardgames or Lemmy.world/lotrboardgames. which can get a bit messy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

So sort of like what the forums of yore were like? You’d have a website for a dedicated, broad topic (like a video game franchise or a brand you like), then subforums for topics in it (specific games in the series or specific products by the brand)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I agree that this seems to be the intent behind Lemmy. But, I also think that, right now, there is such a big influx of people that need accounts that we need to route them into as many instances as possible to keep server stress down. And that means that a lot of communities will be generalized by the new users.

I agree with other comment that this will likely happen organically over time. After things stabilize I think we'll see communities begin to merge with identical or similar communities on other instances. And at that point server admins can start to take a bit more of a firm hand with their instances to try and do exactly what you're describing, if that's what they really wanted.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is already a couple like this. lemmy.dbzer0.com for example is a piracy themed instance, and all communities hosted on it are piracy-related.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yaargh, matey, I be not aware of that plunderin' spot at all, arr! Thank ye kindly for sharin'. Ahoy, raise the masts and set sail on the high seas!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wouldn't the risk be though, that an instance devoted to music, for example, would mean that all music discussion would fall under the control of a single mod/team, opening us up to the kind of controlling shenanigans Reddit was pulling?

And were the instance to go down, it would take everything on that topic with it.

I realise that people would still be free to make their own community on any topic on any instance, but if instances were topic themed, they would likely soon dominate any "independent" communities on that same topic.

All that said, I still have a limited understanding of the fediverse, so perhaps it's not an issue.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί