this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
49 points (94.5% liked)

Games

16841 readers
576 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ninja/post/22012

Click here for YouTube video

BattleBit Remastered, a 254-player FPS game, is currently stealing the limelight on Steam despite being launched in the already crowded market of first-person shooters. Developed by a team of only four people, the $15 indie game quickly became a top seller on the platform. Its success is especially notable since it competes against numerous free, well-supported shooters, yet still manages to outperform even popular titles like Call of Duty.

What's particularly appealing about BattleBit, however, isn't just its gameplay, but its pricing model. Instead of following a free-to-play model, BattleBit costs $15 upfront. But this purchase comes with the assurance that players will receive a fully-featured game with no extra hidden costs. The game currently includes six classes, 39 unlockable guns, dozens of class-specific gadgets, 17 destructible maps, and community server support, among other things, making it a great value for its price.

This model stands in stark contrast to the typical free-to-play games that tend to start with a modest offering and then add more content over time. These games often feel like they are always looking at the player as a potential target for further monetization, with constant reminders about battle pass buy-ins and overpriced skin bundles. This approach can lead to players feeling like they're being asked to invest financially and emotionally in the game's future potential, rather than simply enjoying what the game offers in the present.

BattleBit, with its upfront price and a promise of no further monetary strings, is refreshingly different. It's fun, well-balanced, and surprisingly intense for a game with blocky characters and low-detail environments. The robust proximity chat feature also adds an additional layer of immersion and social interaction, with players often role-playing and communicating with genuine conviction during the game.

Despite its minor shortcomings, like the lackluster sound effects for its guns, BattleBit's previous anonymity has worked in its favor, much like Eric Barone's Stardew Valley. Gamers come in with zero expectations and are often pleasantly surprised by the depth and quality of the game. Even if future updates don't materialize, many players feel they have already received their money's worth from the initial purchase. The game's focus on present value, rather than speculative future updates, appears to be a winning strategy in the eyes of its growing fanbase.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Using FACEit anti cheat (which is kernel level and the company is Saudi Arabian) and dropping Linux is a bad look. The game also doesn't have any sound effects except for bullets. The moderation for proximity chat is also very strict, beware.

[–] weirdo_from_space 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That is very unfortunate, I was thinking about buying it at some point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

On sale, maybe it could be worth your time, but even without microtransactions, the game doesn't hold up to its 15 dollar price tag due to these huge drawbacks

[–] BigBootyBoy 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Strict as in you can't say swear words or you can't scream the n word?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can't swear much, even topics that can be discussed are restricted (it sounds like I'm saying debating is not allowed in an FPS game which is absurd, I'm just saying like you can't do anything outside of interacting within the game about the game)

[–] BigBootyBoy 3 points 1 year ago

Damn that really sucks, are there moderators on the server or something?

[–] priapus 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They didn't drop linux support. They've said there will be servers using faceit and others using eac.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But the servers using EAC will not be part of the trophy progression system is what they've said. That essentially renders it useless anyway.

[–] priapus 1 points 1 year ago

I see, I hadn't heard that. That is unfortunate.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I bought it and got some friends on it too. Definitely worth the $15. 254 players is absolute mayhem

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t really consider it a “boomer shooter,” that’s why the title has a question mark in it. But it is fun, and the graphics make it something I figured I could talk about. The part I like most… no microtransactions. Of course this comes with the downside of anti-cheat as it’s a multiplayer game… I guess you can’t have it all.

[–] weirdo_from_space 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol, I was about to make a comment about BattleBit being the furthest thing from a boomer shooter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Agreed, I’m taking a HUGE liberty classifying it as such based SOLELY on the voxel graphics… But, since I’m the writer, editor, and hobbies t doing this… I’m okay taking liberties on occasion for a game that only costs $15 and has no micros transactions. I REALLY do want to support this idea. I just wish they made it for iPadOS/iOS.

[–] weirdo_from_space 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe they will someday, you can ask the devs. That's what Linux users do 🙂

I'm just glad we hear indie success stories from the multiplayer side too. Mainstream multiplayer is trash.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I agree, this is why I’m trying to highlight indie devs. I’m not perfect at it (I’m barely good), but I enjoy what I do. Thanks for reading.

[–] lloyd 1 points 1 year ago

Think you'll keep playing it consistently?

load more comments
view more: next ›