this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
54 points (98.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43989 readers
625 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I would say Atari but that's just low-hanging fruit because it's a generation I never really got to play as it was before my time. But I am starting to fall out of nostalgia for the NES which is held dearly in a lot of hearts of retro gamers and gamers that have enjoyed what that system had to offer for a few decades.

I know it had offered a lot of classics and gave so many games their start, most of which are still with us today like Final Fantasy for example.

The best guess I can give about why I don't care as much about that generation is because it is very oversaturated when you start entering the world of retro gaming. For retro gaming I prefer SNES and Genesis, because I technically did start playing those when I was born and they were first released. So I have more favorability towards those than the NES and generations before and during it.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I would say Atari but that’s just low-hanging fruit because it’s a generation I never really got to play as it was before my time.

Is there a word for imagined nostalgia? You could play them today, but I think you’d discover that not many Atari 2600 games were actually good.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Anemoia is the word for nostalgic longing for something you didn't actually experience.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Thanks! This apparently is its origin, in 2012: https://www.thedictionaryofobscuresorrows.com/concept/anemoia

Pronounced β€œan-uh-moi-uh.”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Is there a word for imagined nostalgia?

Whatever the word is, UFO 50 captures it perfectly.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Isn't that that just what retro means?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Imagined nostalgia is for sure a thing, I felt some kind of nostalgia playing PokΓ©mon blue even though it was made before I was even born, same for the wild west internet days I never really got to experience

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

Controversial take perhaps, but most of the N64 generation.

There are a few standout games that I think of fondly, but that was the generation where most developers were still trying to figure out 3D gameplay. Most games were clunky, where playing felt more like fighting against the mechanics rather than working within them. And they aren't that pretty to look at.

I also don't feel any nostalgia when looking at modern games that use that sort of visual aesthetic either. I am fine with pixel art games which emulate earlier generations, because the developers are (mostly) still taking that visual medium and elevating it above what technology was capable at the time, and the end result feels artistic and cool to look at. But games that emulate the early 3D art style are emulating the weird aliasing, melty and inconsistent textures, chunky models, etc. which is just taking the current medium and reducing it down to its worst state.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

7th Generation of consoles (PS3, X360, Wii) was pretty meh. The Wii was cool for a time, but it soon became flooded with shovelware and finding a good game was a chore. The PS3 was lackluster at launch and only got its footing at the tail end of the generation. The X360 had very few exclusives because most of their stuff was available on Windows.

This was also a time when apparently every dev, publisher and their mom operated under the presumption that "brown filter = rEaLiSm". That, and bloom. Lots and lots of bloom. Good riddance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

*angry halo and GOW noises.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago

Weirdly enough, Sega Genesis games for some reason. Except for Sonic. They weren't as good as SNES games, I find.

They just feel like they were trying too hard to be 'cool'. Often the graphics and music also didn't appear as refined as the SNES. And the controller layout sucked. I hated the D-pad and 3 buttons wasn't enough. Additionally, there was no standard for which button was for jumping attacking and third function. Whereas in the SNES it was pretty standard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

unpopular opinion: Bruce Lee on Commodore64 is a masterpiece. weird how nobody mentions it.

im not nostalgic for the turbographix/genesis era that straddled the 8bit cpu with 16 bit graphics and struggled. home computers were way more amazing at the time.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The early 2000s.

I was a Genesis kid. Loved the 16 bit era, and also had plenty of 8 bit. Much love all around.

Got into PC gaming in the 1990s. Loved strategy especially, and it's something you can't do well on 16 bit.

But the early 2000s were relatively dark. 3d graphics were around and pretty shitty by today's standards. There was a lot of straight garbage in the gaming market that I don't want to experience again. There was good stuff, like HL2, but on the whole things were bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

But... Dreamcast.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

N64 adventure games (except Mario). They were just janky messes with horrible frame rage camera issues, target hitting issues and weird looking environments. Looking at you Castlevania, but I can't think of any others that I would want to play again either.

[–] otp 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

PS3 era, though that's pretty much on the edge of what retro gaming would be.

My PS3 mostly became a Rock Band machine, so I didn't play most of the other big games of the generation. I also associate the console with the poorest reliability of any console I'd ever had, the longest loading times, and the longest startup times. (Needing to download updates before you could play your game)

I had tons of great gaming memories with the console, even outside of Rock Band, but I just don't have nostalgia for the era (outside of the golden era of Western-developed Rhythm games).

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Games getting bigger and bigger in gigabytes, but still hampered by slow optical disks and slow hard drives. It was good tat the time, but I have more fondness for the cartridges which came before, whose immediacy felt like magic.

[–] otp 4 points 6 days ago

I have to admit that the anticipation of launching a PS1 game is nostalgic for me. I feel like that's the last time that loading screens were bearable. At least until we got SSDs and indie games, lol

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

The 1994-2006 era, roughly the time between the release of Transport Tycoon and Civilization IV

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

The 70s, 80s and 90s as I wasn't born yet

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Late 80's 8 bit. Sure it was great back then playing on Atari 65 or C64, but those games in retrospect simply fucking suck, nearly all shooters and platformers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

The generation where I did not have adult responsibilities to prioritize

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Everything that came before the Gameboy and most consoles. My parents had an weird arbitrary rule about my sister and me not being allowed to have consoles but Gameboy or later Nintendo DS were fine. And as a kid I wasn't really aware of the existence of PS Vita or PSP so those I'm also not really nostalgic for.

[–] southsamurai 5 points 5 days ago

Honestly, I don't get nostalgic for gaming of any era. I do miss some games, and I get nostalgic over playing with people at the age I was then, but gaming as a pastime, or as an era with similar design styles or whatever, I don't really feel that.

When it comes to the games in general, and gaming as a hobby, I've always enjoyed each generation's improvements in graphics and overall improved hardware.

For me, the NES era as an example, it has nothing to do with the games or the console, it's feeling that sense of longing for being young and in my cousin's room with the group of us kids having fun together. There's also that sense of wonder at this new kind of play at home, instead of at an arcade. But I don't particularly feel anything about duck hunt, even though we played that a lot.

It's not about the systems, it's about the shared experiences.

Even when MMOs got big and I was playing alone, my nostalgia is about the online people I played with (some of whom I still talk to), having that magic experience of playing a game in a team with a guy from Scotland, some German guy that couldn't speak English worth a damn except cursing, a lady and her husband from Nebraska, and a kid from California. It was so fucking cool that you could end up playing with Russians, Koreans, damn near anyone in the world, and have a real human connection.

But the games? They were meh at best, and can't match the immersive graphics of stuff that came just a few years later.

Mind you, I'd still play those games if I had people to play with and the games were live, but it isn't the same as nostalgia, of missing the era in that longing way.

[–] captain_aggravated 2 points 4 days ago

PC gaming is kind of a continuum to me. I can draw hard lines at DOS > Windows and Win9x > NT-based Windows a la XP where compatibility mostly or partially breaks but you can play a lot of games made since the Steam era on modern hardware without much fuss.

Consoles really define the "generations," and the only console generation I'm really nostalgic for is the SNES era. Mine was always a Nintendo household, and the SNES was my childhood. I had an N64, I've gone back to play it, I'm not sure even Ocarina of Time holds up anymore. The thing I still clutch to from the N64 era is the music. The SNES though, sometimes I want to go back and play those old games.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Anything pre-NES era and PlayStation. I had a ZX Spectrum, which was a British console that was around in the 80s. It had lots of fun games which were plentiful and cheap, they’d only be a couple of quid each. But most of them were just really basic versions of what we have now and I have no intention of getting my old machine out to play them.

I’m not nostalgic for the PlayStation because I always felt like the only audiences it catered for were the Japanese and people who liked all that money-grabbing type of stuff, like FIFA. Neither of those were for me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Everything post ps2

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

NES is a good one, it was juuust about part of my time in that a couple of people I rarely saw had one and I loved playing it with them when I did seem them, but really that's because I didn't at the time have a games machine or a computer so anything would have been good. I've played a few of the games and they were alright, pretty good. I got an original NES console with several games as an adult and was super excited because it's so classic and retro and I found that much as I love owning it, I really couldn't stand playing it for more than a few minutes. The games are just, kinda boring and they feel very, incomplete. They suffy some of the same problems as the Atari games I played just to see what the time period was like, those Atari ones in particular feel very unfinished, like someone thought it'd be interesting to try making a game, had one attempt, made something like a sort of prototype and then got bored and just shoved it on the market and moved on to a different hobby. The NES games weren't as bad as that, but there was a similar feel of lack of consideration for the actual player. To me, it the NES kind of represents when games were starting to get good, which I think would annoy a lot of people that were gamers for a long time before that, because it's always annoying when younger people make these proclamations totally ignorant of the time they're speaking about, but in my head at least that's what the NES generation represents. It's the starting point of what was to come, with some flashes of brilliance and a lot of meh and even the really good bits aren't as good as their later more refined iterations.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I stopped caring about games once they went 3D.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Early always-online consoles and their multiplayer-as-main-mode bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Xbone? Not sure if there was anything before that. Cause 360 could be played offline. Aswell as PS3.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago

Honestly, all of it. Not a video game fan even having been raised through its development. I have zero nostalgia for any of it.