allegations of sexual misconduct
Why do they always misspell rape in these articles?? 🤔
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
236 points (99.6% liked)
politics
19148 readers
1990 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeah this bugs the hell out of me. A 17 year old is not capable of consenting to sex with an adult. That’s how our laws work. Sex with a minor is by definition rape, so they should absolutely call it what it is: a credible rape allegation.
A 17 year old is not capable of consenting to sex with an adult. That’s how our laws work
Well, unfortunately....
(And because I know people will assume otherwise unless I state plainly this is not a defense of the rapist)
Yeah, I forgot how many states are so damn creepy about age of consent. I think the alleged rape happened in Florida though, so the issue is moot, but still worth pointing out.
But also, our national definition of an adult is 18, so how the hell can the states be so different on consent? Federalism has its downsides I guess…
Curious if the downvotes are because I wasn’t totally right about the law, or something else?
I think a lot of these are covering Romeo and Juliet scenarios. 19+16 is def not ok in a lot of those.
Most states don't have an explicit crime called rape it's generally called sexual misconduct or sexual assault.
This is great news. I'll enjoy this up until the next shoe drops, and Trump's next pick is even worse than Gaetz.
Cannon.
Honest question though: Could this train be obviously headed very quickly to a cliff that the die hard, career grifters are gonna pass and only the megalomaniac/delusional/etc figures are strapped in with their special RGB gold plated maga hats?
We've already jumped off the cliff. It's not a matter of if we hit the ground. It's a matter of when we hit it.
Fair point lol
Trump should just offer to keep Merrick Garland on board as AG. Nobody has done more to assure Trump was not held accountable for 1/6 than him. He’d be perfect for providing cover for whatever crimes Donnie and Elmo are cooking up right now at Mar-a-Lago.
Gaetz? Pull out? First time for everything I guess...
So is Greene going to follow up on her threat?
The report wasn't released, was it? So there's nothing to follow up on
Well, there is the fact that she has admitted to knowingly hiding scandals.
In other words, she is an accessory, after the fact, to crimes.
"I AM HIDING CRIMINAL SCANDALS INVOLVING MASTEROFN001! LOTS AND LOTS OF SCANDALS!"
I don't need a law degree to walk myself out of that one, and neither does she.
If you admit to being an accessory, or claim to be, that would be broadcasting that you have committed a crime.
If someone says they have commited a crime, they need to be investigated for the crime(s) they claim to have commited (accessory, obstruction, etc).
Walk back all you want.
It's either libel or it's complicity in a cover-up or blackmail or extortion.
Great now he can pick someone worse
Get ready for a less public AG hut just as dangerous one.
So Trump won't back off, so the candidates have to instead. Or do we think Trump told him to withdraw?