"boobies"
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
143 points (94.4% liked)
Asklemmy
43984 readers
727 users here now
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- [email protected]: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Joke's on you. We're thinking about that all the time anyway.
Whatcha out! He is behind you.
Billions of people turning back at the same time....
Any argument for your freedom is an argument for everyone's freedom.
Poop now
I am Lord Vishnu. I am your God
Just to see what happens.
Buy a as much of xyz stock as possible. Plant thought "buy xyz stock".
"I've seen that!"
βIt has awoken, and it is coming.β
Pssst, hey. You're in a simulation. Wake up!
more happiness is more happiness for you.
Hear me out first.
'Gender critical' theory. Everyone should have this theory, as originally defined, planted in their head. Men would only associate 'masculinity' with their role in providing semen for procreation. Women would only associate 'femininity' with their role in providing eggs for procreation.
There would be no gender-non-conformity because there would be no ideas about gender to conform to. A minority of men would, as an everyday thing, wear dresses. It would be impossible to verify that someone was a woman or not (short of x-raying their uterus).
The important thing, is that if this happened, the people currently claiming that they're 'gender critical' would lose their freaking minds.
This.... sounds very distopian.
Humans on earth would provide their recreational organs to a common cause.
There would be no physical sex (if I am right about what you wrote).
Freaky
Ha, no, I didn't mean it like that. The 'role of providing semen' and the 'role of providing eggs' would be during normal intercourse.
It's wild how threatening people find this idea. I really can't get understand why it is so hard to just imagine seeing each person as an individual. No one is walking around dividing the world a priori into "hockey fans or not" and thinking our society would collapse of if you couldn't do that all of a sudden.
load more comments
(3 replies)
Some would say Love is always the answer for everything. I think that would be a higher state for many. At the very least kindness.
Is "kill yourself immediately" too dark? Probably. But if like three billion people died suddenly and without a massive environmental impact like nukes or some other poisoning of the world, could solve a bunch of problems.
load more comments
(2 replies)
"Fuck you"
Degrowth now.
A really intense urge to fart. Let's see who acts on it lol