this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
129 points (99.2% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6732 readers
531 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's just "Ukraine." The Ukraine is what the Soviets called it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's no "the" in either Ukrainian or Russian. It was more of an "in" vs "on" argument in the Slavic languages.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Regardless, in English, "The Ukraine" refers to the time of Soviet/Russian possession, while "Ukraine" recognizes Ukraine's national sovereignty.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I'm quite aware, just wanted to give some additional commentary considering the Soviets never literally called it that. This is an English distinction (for which Ukraine did ask after independence)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I know they don't work against nlaws and such, but do they work against the smaller drones that have become so prevalent?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Yeah. Russian vehicles with cages or sheds sometimes take several hits to cook off. I assume soldiers wouldn't post many videos of failed strikes so it's hard to know exactly how effective they are overall, but detonating an explosive away from the vehicle's armor is broadly very good.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

I've read that a shaped charge's armor piercing jet of plasma has a fairly long reach. A direct hit with the plasma spear directed toward the center of the vehicle would probably still pierce the vehicle. However, a cage like that might provide protection from a glancing blow, where the plasma jet is not directed toward the center of mass - like, instead of getting a hole through the corner of the roof, the jet misses entirely.

[–] nuke 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It works against the shit Russia uses

[–] eestileib 6 points 2 months ago

I think these are for the smaller kamikaze fpv drones used by both sides.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Are those Ukrainian or Russian vehicles? And why is there a cage around it?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Keeps damage down from drone attacks as they don't get through to pierce the vehicle itself.

[–] nuke 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's an American HMMWV in use by Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Huh, never knew Humvee was a pronounced acronym

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

all acronyms are pronounceable. If you spell it out, that's an initialism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] nuke 3 points 2 months ago

Hope*

Russia has cope cages. Ukraine has hope cages.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

Guessing to help harden it against sharpnel.