this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

homelab

6646 readers
28 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So I have some space on my server rack, but not a lot of money lying around.

What I’m trying to achieve is a nas setup for my security camera system. It has 30 cameras, and 4 drives fill up in 3 months. 3X3TB drives.

Looking on eBay for a second hand rack mounted NaS is pretty expensive. Could I build one? From a jbod or something? I’ve got a nice big space in my rack doing nothing.

(I know I could buy bigger drives, but I kinda like the idea of experimenting with something g different) ✌️💛

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure you can.

I use Rosewill rackmounted cases because they're cheap and get the job done. They're a far cry from any enterprise gear, but that's not really needed in a homelab. Think of the typical material used on a desktop PC.

This is the case I use, but see if anything else jumps out at you:

Rosewill RSV-R4200U 4U Server Chassis Rackmount Case | 11 3.5" Bays, 3 2.5" Devices| ATX, CEB Compatible | 2 120mm Fan, 2 80mm Fans | USB 3.0, USB 2.0 | Black https://a.co/d/icPXCTH

The official Rosewill rails are pretty crap, so I used these. They work great:

iStar TC-RAIL-20 20-Inch Sliding Rail Kit for Most Rackmount Chassis https://a.co/d/iaJBFNl

Beyond that, where you want to go is sort of up to you. Really any motherboard / CPU / RAM will do if you're only using it for storage. I used a few different parts I had laying around already, and then got some open box ones off eBay for things I needed to finish out the build.

OS is up to you as well. I like unRAID because it's the "grow as you go" OS, but I've used TrueNAS in the past as well. Both are solid options but have a lot of different pros and cons.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Great tip on the rails!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I second the call out on these Rosewill cases. For the price they're pretty solid.

Also, you're right about the Rosewill rails, they're terrible (source: I bought them and regret it).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

+1 on the Rosewill cases. I bought the IstarUSA rails and managed to mangle the bearings on one side. It's still generally functional though.

[–] ryknow 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was using a home built machine for several years as a Nas, and it was fine, but I ultimately upgraded to a Dell R510. They can be had pretty cheap, and have 12x 3.5" bays. I also added an HBA that I plug into a Lenovo sa120 (direct attached storage) I bought, for a total of 24x 3.5" drives.

I mention the sa120 because it just leads to expandability down the road for you. My r510 is one of my most favorite machines. I'm currently migrating data from 15x 4tb drives, over to 6x 10tb drives and I'm going to be shutting the DAS down to save electricity.

The r510 isn't easy on electric usage, but it has been Rock solid for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have a similar setup with my 2 HPE dl380. 1 with a netapp. And the other a Lenovo.

I wouldn’t mind throwing in a dell, just to learn something new. Is there plenty of resources for the R510 like there is with the 380’s?

What software do you run to make it a nas?

[–] ryknow 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm running Trunas. I've been using it for many years, and it's been an fantastic solution for me.

As far as resources, what do you mean? It's an older server, so Google is your friend for sure. But I've had zero issues sourcing parts that I may have needed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Excellent!

Yeh, I meant parts and drivers and firmware and whatnot.

[–] ryknow 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, drivers and firmware are readily available... Just know they aren't updated at all. Basically update to whatever the latest versions are, and then run it.

My only complaint is with idrac. After getting a supermicro server. It's impi is a much better experience than idrac... But.... That aside, I jabe zero complaints with my r510.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Awesome. There’s my next project.

Yeh HP‘s ilo isn’t great either.

[–] 0x4E4F 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Void Linux + mdadm in RAID5 + BTRFS with snapshots enabled. Trust me, you won't regret it 😉. I have a working storage like this, but with 6 drives (scrap 2TB ones in RAID5) and BTRFS with zstd set at 10. Compression on MPEG2 content is... more than I ever hoped for to be honest, like 30, 40% compression. MPEG4, not as much, but you can shim about 5 to 10%.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

MPEG2 is, by today's standards, horribly inefficient, so that is to be expected. Transcoding, in that case, will gain a lot more. But if your mp4 files still compress significantly with a standard lossless compression algorithm, something is wrong with your encoder settings. Even xz, which, even at the default Level 6 is often better than zstd at 19, will generally do less than 1%, typically 0.2%, even at level 9 (the highest).

[–] 0x4E4F 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

To be honest, that percentage was after deduping everything, so it could be due to dups being deduped. The first one (the MPEG2 one) was before deduping, so that should be valid.

zstd can go up to 15 on BTRFS, not higher.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do not do this setup if your data is critical. btrfs raid 5 isn't stable

[–] 0x4E4F 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know. The RAID part is done with mdadm, BTRFS is just for the FS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, that seems a bit less risky

[–] 0x4E4F 1 points 1 year ago

It's not risky at all, it's how Synology does it.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As to filling up the drives so fast, have you considered transcoding it to a smaller format (such as HEVC/H.265) in real time? I know that would require quite some CPU power. Even H.264 is likely to improve on camera native formats, as those often need to encode the videos with embedded/low-power CPUs. Do you need to retain the footage beyond 3 months?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I’ll check it out.

There’s no set period I need to retain. It’s just been handy, got myself out of trouble a few times in compliance complaints. a couple times I have wished I was able to go back further. That’s all.

load more comments
view more: next ›