this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
287 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1951 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

“Make it so that, maybe like grandma or grandpa wants to help out a little bit more, or maybe there's an aunt or uncle who wants to help out a little bit more," he said.

Yes. We should all just get comfortable with getting by with less and be expected to work further into old age for free.

It’s really the best way we can increase shareholder value and help concentrate wealth at the top.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 months ago

What nobody usually mentions is that if there are grandparents, aunts and uncles, siblings who are able to help with child care, they already fucking are, it’s not like there’s some vast untapped reserve of child care labor out there sitting idle.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Ah, yes. The Giving Tree, except possibly with multiple kids sourcing from the same trees. Good ol' stump-forest child rearing.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I don't care how rich or poor you are. Every parent, and I mean every parent has considered every single friend and family member they could possibly squeeze free child care out of.

Nobody is going to turn down free, reliable child care. Nobody. If a parent isn't already tapping grandma, siblings, and friends, there's a reason for that. Could be ranging anywhere from "Mom also has to work" to "Mom can't keep up with a toddler any more" to "Mom is a fucking psychopath and I cut her out of my life 12 years ago."

This is what happens when you try to mix "inbred hillbilly" with "incoherent moron"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I once got a call from friends at ten in the morning asking if I could go to my goddaughter's mother's Day brunch at the daycare so she wouldn't be alone. Apparently mom couldn't get the day off and grandmall was supposed to go but grandmall fell sick that morning. So I was the hail Mary call and I just happened to be on PTO that day. You're damn right I dropped everything to go have juice and cookies and make bracelets with my girl. Point is that everyone who can and gives a shit is already involved in childcare.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

My cousin's wife won't let anyone babysit their kids because it gives her anxiety, except for occasionally a few hours with the grandparents. It's nuts. She really needs to get some therapy before her kids are old enough to have anxiety themselves about being somewhere without her.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He's saying grandparents should help out ...

If you're not familiar with Vance, according to him his mom was a drug addict, married a couple dudes (which is JD has had like 3 different legal names) and then his mom's parents raised him

Which is likely where he got his weird views on hillbillies from. He's projecting all of his mother's faults into a whole demographic.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Gotta wonder if his mother, or father who walked out on him, would be trusted to watch his kids today. I'd imagine not. Things are simple for everyone but him.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When my wife told me what he said I assumed it was an onion article. When she said it was real I assumed it was taken out of context - surely there was some policy proposal behind these comments, like a new federal stipend for caretakers. Nope - he genuinely seems to believe that the government's role in childcare is reminding parents that they can ask friends/family for help, as if there's a struggling parent out there who needs to hear this. I really don't understand who he's trying to reach with these comments - it's like reminding homeless people that they can panhandle if they're struggling, which is an obtuse way of saying "fuck you, you're on your own."

[–] CaptDust 23 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

"fuck you, you're on your own."

Lol, the only consistent policy they've held since I've been of voting age.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

"Unless you're rich, then we've got your back!"

[–] ilovededyoupiggy 3 points 2 months ago

I've always heard it as "fuck you, I got mine" but yeah, same sentiment.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago

“The slow days of most people having retired grandparents at home with nothing else to do are over for most people as the older generations are still working the same hamster wheels for survival that the young parents are just getting on.”

Meanwhile, three of my grandparents died before I was born. Grandma will have to look after a shitload of grandkids with no help.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

Essentially he’s saying: not my problem.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Every time I see stories of this guy, my brain instantly goes “he’s Fred Waterford”.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Make it so that.. there's an aunt or uncle who wants to help out a little more."

I see a lot of people talking about how they're trying to force grandparents to work until they die, which is completely fucked, but not enough people noticed how he's trying to make people responsible for their sibling's choice to have kids or not.

Basically, if you don't already have generational wealth, he's going to make it so no one in your entire family can escape the cycle of poverty.

Absolutely horrifying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

That is unfortunately how almost 70% of the post-boomers have to live. Working til they die.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Okay, couch-fucker.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Remember, when Mr. Word Salad gets elected and dies soon after, THIS will be his replacement.

Why? Even if enough people bother to vote for Harris, Cheatoes' friends have infiltrated the polling stations to steal the election for real

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Man ill never trust a dude with Jared Leto eye liner