https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/headline-usa-bias/
No one will ever take this community seriously if you continue to allow ridiculous sources like this.
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/headline-usa-bias/
No one will ever take this community seriously if you continue to allow ridiculous sources like this.
No one will ever take this community seriously if you continue to allow ridiculous sources
I feel like the time to worry about this has long passed.
While I'll agree that sight is conspiracy dribble, they did sight and quote a seemingly legit newspaper in the article
Which by your own standards is fine, https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/denver-gazette/
Which says the same thing.
Please attack the argument when dealing with these people, give them something to think about instead of just says "ur source is bad".
I have no intention of actually engaging with op for reasons that should be pretty obvious.