this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2024
714 points (97.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54781 readers
592 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While we can be pretty confident that Reddit has its own motivations (i.e. self-interest) for fighting these lawsuits, this is still a good news story for pirates.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (12 children)

It was insane to think they would comply with this to begin with. Downloading pirated media isn't illegal, neither is discussing piracy. What is illegal is redistribution, and good luck proving that on a large scale community like this.

EDIT: These are 2 USA based companies, US Laws apply to this context.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In a motion to compel that was filed last month, movie companies Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures argued that "Reddit users do not have a recognized privacy interest in their IP addresses."

But in Wednesday's ruling, US Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson said, "The Court finds no reason to believe provision of an IP address is not unmasking subject to First Amendment scrutiny."

Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures previously sued the Internet service provider Frontier Communications, alleging that it is liable for its users' copyright infringement.

The fact that movie companies only sought IP addresses instead of names this time around wasn't enough to sway the court.

As in the previous cases, the movie companies "cannot show that the information they seek here is unavailable from other sources," Hixson wrote.

Voltage Holdings and Screen Media Ventures cited Reddit posts in which users say that Frontier didn't terminate their Internet service despite sending many copyright infringement notices about torrent downloads.


The original article contains 598 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›