I think a good example of the tradeoffs between government and private companies would be lunar landing programs. If you throw cold war nuclear money at the problem, you can do things fast and ambitiously like Apollo. But nowadays for Artemis, the urgency is a lot less, so there's all sorts of games with Congress (putting things all over the place that don't make sense, lunar gateway etc) to make sure they keep funding. That results in a much more expensive much less capable rocket (SLS) than something like starship that has a whole lot less political constraints like starship. NASA can and has gotten things done well, but the funding and incentive structure makes it harder.
this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
1288 points (91.6% liked)
Memes
45753 readers
848 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
Honestly I was expecting more dogshit takes in the comments. Anyway everyone should read Elizabeth Anderson’s book “Private Government”
But mail
Look at spacex they are more efficient then nasa
there's an exception to the rule
load more comments
(11 replies)
Even if the are more efficient, they earned the regarding profit for a small number of people, who has to much. For the society it is a loose loose. The services become more expensive and it lead to a redistribution of wealth from poor to rich, whitch is even worse for the society and the economy.