this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
1288 points (91.6% liked)

Memes

45753 readers
848 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JohnDClay 2 points 1 year ago

I think a good example of the tradeoffs between government and private companies would be lunar landing programs. If you throw cold war nuclear money at the problem, you can do things fast and ambitiously like Apollo. But nowadays for Artemis, the urgency is a lot less, so there's all sorts of games with Congress (putting things all over the place that don't make sense, lunar gateway etc) to make sure they keep funding. That results in a much more expensive much less capable rocket (SLS) than something like starship that has a whole lot less political constraints like starship. NASA can and has gotten things done well, but the funding and incentive structure makes it harder.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Honestly I was expecting more dogshit takes in the comments. Anyway everyone should read Elizabeth Anderson’s book “Private Government”

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (12 children)

Look at spacex they are more efficient then nasa

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

there's an exception to the rule

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even if the are more efficient, they earned the regarding profit for a small number of people, who has to much. For the society it is a loose loose. The services become more expensive and it lead to a redistribution of wealth from poor to rich, whitch is even worse for the society and the economy.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›