Games

32736 readers

1232 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

627

Diablo 4's new mount costs more than the actual game (www.pcgamesn.com)

submitted 9 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

181 comments fedilink hide all child comments

And have we come full circle to god damn horse armor.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] zalgotext -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I concede, you're right I'm wrong. Have a great night.

[–] mindbleach 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't want your blatant eye-roll, I want you to take this problem seriously.

[–] zalgotext 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I take the problem seriously, but talking about it with someone like you isn't productive.

[–] mindbleach 0 points 9 months ago

Like I'm thrilled to get 'it's cosmetic! just don't buy it!' for the zillionth time.

The problem is the business model. Serious discussion requires addressing the business model. The same business model, with lower prices, is the same business model. The same business model, with fewer stats attached, is the same business model. The same business model, without added gambling, is the same business model.

Fines for using the business model will not fix the business model. Even defining misuses worth fining is an immediate error, because the problem is the business model, itself.