this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
-56 points (7.6% liked)

Conservative

394 readers
50 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What? I said "as long as it's a culture war issue." meaning that people are playing dirty, and refuse to not play dirty.

So I am saying restricting sex education is a bad policy, and the moral thing to do is to teach children, specifically young adults, about the world is a good thing. The policy I'm advocating for is good sex education, and conservatives want to argue for a system that allows for more pederasty. How can I not be against that?

But "good" policy is subjective. Talking policy in a partisan space like this won't move anyone. I would be screaming into a void.

[–] MomoTimeToDie -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I also want good sex Ed. But I don't consider obscene books in an uncontrolled setting to be even remotely decent sex Ed. It's no better than just handing them Google, and telling them safe search is off.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you find it obscene then make a book that queer youths can relate to that can replace it. As it currently stands if that book is the only thing that some queer youths can find commonality in then it is a good book to have for their mental health.

[–] MomoTimeToDie 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If they're so desperate, they can read it on their own. School libraries don't hold a monopoly on book distribution

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

I really wish I could grab your eyes and make you look at the state of children.

I have a brother inlaw who is used to be in the FBI a few years ago, who found out he was Asexual. Before that realization it put a huge strain on his marriage.

There is no way to learn about something that you have no idea even exists. If they will fire you for talking about the possibility of liking the same sex, then someone can suggest the book instead of becoming at risk of getting fired. Once again, getting fired for saying that anything but hetero exists at all is bad, and this gives a way to "talk" about it.