this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
327 points (95.5% liked)

Not The Onion

12405 readers
1604 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

...why are courtroom sketch artist still a thing?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because it's usually not allowed to take pictures in court

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's not a real reason. Most courts are recorded, have stenographer and apparently sketch artists. There's absolutely no reason for court sketch artists to exist in modern society. It's just silly and wreaks of some conservative tradition.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think providing steady employment to a local artist is the worst thing taxes support.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If we're gonna be handing out money for totally worthless tasks, oh boy imma be rich

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Be real, bro, you already do that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

....are you illiterate? That's exactly what I said.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I called your current job useless, actually, but don't worry your pretty little head about the details.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, you are illiterate. Ok then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Had to think a bit for that one, huh?

Understandable for your situation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Those recordings are not available to the public though, right? Isn’t that the difference? Or am I just mislead here?

I see why the tradition of it feels conservative. But I dunno. I think it’s cool. Seems like good culture.

[–] RidgeDweller 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But why? Seems arbitrary and antiquated

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Think it's to protect the identities of people

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's working well, I definitely do not know it's trump Jr there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not who it's supposed to be protecting lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Then who’s it supposed to protect?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Witnesses, the jury, people like that

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because AI aren't allowed in court, yet...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Why does the defendant have a different number of fingers in every scene?"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

-AI flips you off with 13 middle fingers on each hand

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Artist is better for privacy.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only proportionally to how much they suck at their craft

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

More like for not accidentally including jury members in the shot