this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
519 points (94.5% liked)

Casual UK

2200 readers
48 users here now

Casual UK

A casual place for banter and anything that doesn't fit in anywhere else.

Have chat and a natter. Talk about anything and everything.

Keep it casual.

Rules

Other communities:

Here:

Elsewhere:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Correct me if I got anything wrong, TA!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That's called selection bias btw.

No one in my family has died in a car crash going back to their invention. Doesn't mean anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The variables involved in driving are not reliable. Even if you're the safest driver you can still be involved in an accident. The same cannot be said about repeatedly boiling water in the same vessel for years, like the person you are responding to. They are not lucky in the same way drivers are to avoid accidents.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's called experience with the device and situation at hand

I'm not claiming superheating doesn't exist, I'm pointing out that the top level claim of "this is super dangerous" is fucking bunk

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The people who've been burnt by super heated water also have experience with the device and situation at hand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'd not experience this situation as, like another commenter stated, even a pyrex glass has nucleation sites for boiling

If they've double-microwaved the water then they have a chance at superheating, but that is not the same situation as just microwaving water in a pyrex cup, the thing that was being called extremely dangerous

But sure, well just keep being scared of doing it at all because some people can't remember that they already heated something