Technology
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
view the rest of the comments
I'm not sure what else to say. I don't look at race and genitals as a qualifying factor in pay.
How am I implying this? I don't know how else to put this into English words.
I'm simply voicing my opinion. Sex/gender and skin color should have nothing to do when it comes to choosing winners and losers. How is this a controversial opinion?
You keep saying it's well known. By who? Who cares? I don't own the businesses. I'm simply pointing out that sex or gender or skin color should have no effect on promotions and pay. What else do I need to say? I'm sorry the word vag triggered you but that's how I talk sometimes.
Anyways, whatever you're trying to bait me into isn't working so roll on.
Who's blaming anybody?
I don't believe that sex/gender and skin color should have any bearing on pay and promotions.
What's wrong with that statement.