this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2023
44 points (79.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7241 readers
110 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (15 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (14 children)

There were funds appropriated for a portion of the wall in 2019 by Trump with the requirement that construction is completed by the end of 2023. Biden asked congress to reappropriate the funds, as he does not have the power to do so, and congress refused. His hands are mostly tied here from what I understand.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Sounds like bs to me. He had to waive laws to do this. And if he didn't do this what would happen? Would he get in trouble with the super president?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah Congress didn't tie his hands and force him to override laws (which by the acts definition should only be invoked to protect the nation against threats).

He could just add easily declare his hands tied by the 26 laws he is instead breaking. He could say the wall's completion wouldn't do anything to enhance national security (something i recall libs saying when it was trumps wall).

This is a lie, plain and simple.

[–] halvo317 6 points 1 year ago

Waive laws? Lol. He would get impeached because that's breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yes you're recognizing the liberal urge to defend fascist behavior

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not defending it, since I'm not familiar enough with the topic, but he waived protections provided the laws - not the laws themselves, which must be within his power if he's done it.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)