this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
88 points (89.3% liked)

MeanwhileOnGrad

1393 readers
6 users here now

"Oh, this is calamity! Calamity! Oh no, he's on the floor!"

Welcome to MoG!


Meanwhile On Grad


Documenting hate speech, conspiracy theories, apologia/revisionism, and general tankie behaviour across the fediverse. Memes are welcome!


What is a Tankie?


Alternatively, a detailed blog post about Tankies.

(caution of biased source)


Basic Rules:

Sh.itjust.works Instance rules apply! If you are from other instances, please be mindful of the rules. — Basically, don't be a dick.

Hate-Speech — You should be familiar with this one already; practically all instances have the same rules on hate speech.

Apologia(Using the Modern terminology for Apologia) No Defending, Denying, Justifying, Bolstering, or Differentiating authoritarian acts or endeavours, whether be a Pro-CCP viewpoint, Stalinism, Islamic Terrorism or any variation of Tankie Ideology.

Revisionism — No downplaying or denying atrocities past and present. Calling Tankies shills, foreign/federal agents, or bots also falls under this rule. Extremists exist. They are real. Do not call them shills or fake users as it handwaves their extremism.

Tankies can explain their views but may be criticised or attacked for them. Any slight infraction on the rules above will immediately earn a warning and possibly a ban.

Off-topic Discussion — Do not discuss unrelated topics to the point of derailing the thread. Stay focused on the direct content of the post as opposed to arguing.

You'll be warned if you're violating the instance and community rules. Continuing poor behaviour after being warned will result in a ban or removal of your comments. Bans typically only last 24 hours, but each subsequent infraction will double the amount. Depending on the content, the ban time may be increased. You may request an unban at any time.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Barbarian 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Fascist is more than just authoritarian, there's a lot of other components (fetishization of the military, an obsession with returning to the "good old days", portraying scapegoats as simultaneously unbeatably strong and pathetically weak, etc)

The USSR was authoritarian, but not fascist.

EDIT: To clarify, I'm no fan of the USSR and their actions to put it mildly, but we shouldn't dilute the word fascist by making it a synonym for authoritarianism.

[–] goat 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The Soviet Union's propaganda and culture tick all of those, though.

But fair, I typically use authoritarian anyway.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I do not think so. There was no “return to the good old days” in USSR at all. The ideology, while was stressing the importance to defend itself, did not fetishized the military. Nationalism was also missing. And instead there was class fight, common means of production, etc. It was quite different. The only common part was the authoritarian government and the principle that the state is greater than individual.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

USSR didn't fetishize the military? Are you high? Can I have some?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I lived there. No, military was not fetishized. Most of the people would not want to go and serve. The draft was something to avoid if you can.

[–] goat 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You lived there? How old are you?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

50+. Do not want to give personal information on internet more than needed.

[–] goat 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you didn't actually experience life under the soviet gulags.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I did not claimed I am. But Soviet ideology and fascist ideology are quite different. It is not like there must be just single ideology that can do bad things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. There are common elements too. Yet there were quite different. There are common elements between fascism and democracy (both allow private property, for example, both have idea of state), so what? The world is not binary.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There was the idea of bringing the revolution to others. While mostly after Stalin, the USSR heavily engaged in combat to exert its influence. The Korean and Vietnamese Civil Wars were proxy wars in which both the US and the USSR were engaged in. Then there was the soviet invasion of Afghanistan, too.

Their propaganda has a lot of hints of glorifying the military, sacrifice and fanaticism.

[–] goat 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't doing things for the sake of the state nationalism?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

You do not do that for the sake of state. You do that for the collective. State is just bureaucratic representation of that. In fascist Germany you would do that for the Germany and German nation specifically. In USSR you do not do that for USSR or USSR nation (there was no such thing).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Generally that's regarded as civic nationalism ("People are bound together by a common government"), whereas most people think of ethnic nationalism ("People are bound together by common descent or culture") when they speak of nationalism. Though there is a strong argument to be made for the SovUnion being an extension of Russian domination over other ethnicities, just like the Russian Empire which preceded it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

China, with it s having a system of private capital solidly co-opted and kept under the thumb of the government, far more aligns with the definition of fascism than the Soviet Union did

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I think the only thing the USSR didn't do when it comes to that fascism checklist is "returning to the good old days". Other than that, Soviets fetishized the military and used scapegoats, too.

For the scapegoats it was most often the capitalists. The propaganda they used is very similar to Nazi and Imperial Japanese propaganda.

The USSR's political structure was more fascist and totalitarian than authoritarian.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

For when a distinction is needed, I've seen the term pseudo-fascist being used. It's quite fitting and works in modern contexts as well

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

fetishization of the military, an obsession with returning to the “good old days”, portraying scapegoats as simultaneously unbeatably strong and pathetically weak, etc

You've perfectly described Russia since WW2.