this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2023
19 points (100.0% liked)

news

23567 readers
25 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

edit: changed title from 'False Fukushima Fears' to 'Exaggerated Fukushima Fears', sacrificing my lovely alliteration as others have pointed out that it would be too much to say that the fears of radiation leakages are unfounded, but merely to say that this is the least bad option given previous precedent as cynesthesia has pointed out.

Image is of the large array of water storage tanks holding the tritium-contaminated water.

This week's preamble is very kindly provided by our beautiful poster @[email protected], with some light editing. In periods where not much of earth-shattering importance is happening in the news, I hope to do this more often!


In 2011, the Fukushima nuclear incident occurred. Since then, water has been used to cool radioactive waste and debris, which contaminates the water with radioactive isotopes. Currently, TEPCO, the Japanese energy company that is reponsible to Fukushima, is storing about 1.3 million m^3^ of contaminated water (equivalent to about 500 Olympic swimming pools for our American friends) in about 1000 tanks. Approximately 100,000 m3 of contaminated cooling water is generated per year to this day. TEPCO doesn't want to store escalating volumes of nuclear waste for decades until half-lives are spent. This would mean adding substantial storage capacity every year at increased cost and risk of tank spills.

The contaminated water includes heavier isotopes like caesium as well as hydrogen's isotope, tritum. Caesium is a big atom at 137 molar mass (we love our tremendous atoms, folks) while tritium is heavy hydrogen and has only a molar mass of 3 (pathetic, low energy). The TEPCO people are using water treatment to remove heavy isotopes from water, but not tritium. The large adult isotopes are easy to remove with treatment but tritium is incorporated into water, so it blends in with the others. The treated Fukushima water contains low levels of the big isotopes but still contains tritium.

Isotopes release radiation that damages the body's cells. The longer an individual molecule containing an isotope is in a body, the more likely it is that the isotope will go BRAZAP and release radiation that fucks up the cells. Bioaccumulation is a toxicology term for how certain contaminants can accumulate in the food cycle. For example, algae eat contaminants, then the algae is eaten by bugs, then bugs by fish, then fish by people. Isotopes that are bioaccumulative like our large adult son caesium are more hazardous. Tritium is not bioaccumulative because it is effectively part of water. Water cycles through bodies quickly - that's why you sweat and pee and get thirsty. spray-bottle

Fukushima water would be treated and then then mixed with seawater at a ratio of 1:800 before it is pumped 1km offshore. Each year approximately 166,000 m3 of treated water will be released, which will draw down the volume of contaminated water being stored over a few decades. Real-time stats associated with the release are found here. At the point of discharge, water contains about 207 Bq/L of radioactivity, about 16 times greater than the 10-15 Bq/L background level in the ocean overall. Drinking water guidelines for tritium radioactivity range from 1,000-10,000 Bq/L, if one were to drink seawater.

In wastewater treatment terms, this is a small amount of dilution in a very large body of water. It is unlikely to have any measurable impact per the terms of Western science. In the context of mother nature taking yet another one for the team and environmental distress, this sucks. In the context of making the best of a shitty situation, the Fukushima water release is peanuts compared to the many other environmental liabilities that are not addressed. For example, the Hanford Site is an example of a nuclear wastewater storage facility gone/going wrong in Oregon.


Ending note by 72: By far the biggest impact of the release of this water won't be its direct effects, but those on commerce and international relations. Almost half of Japanese aquatic exports go to China, comprising 8% of all Japanese firms shipping goods to China, and they have now been cut off due to their anger at Japan. Perhaps this reaction and the cancellation of imports was inevitable, as nuclear power and radiation in general is a poorly understood, frightening, and thus easily exploitable topic in every country. China is not the first country to use a misunderstanding of radiation risk to try and achieve a goal - Germany seems very pleased with itself - and they will not be the last.

In all: it is unequivocal that China is massively exaggerating the risks of this water's release. However, the bellicose rhetoric and actions of Japan, South Korea, and America are a much greater danger to the region, and none of the three seem to be in any hurry to try diplomacy instead of increasing military budgets and gearing up for war.


It's that time again - every two months I give myself a week off, to rest and recalibrate. Your regularly scheduled programming will resume next week.

Here is the map of the Ukraine conflict, courtesy of Wikipedia.

Links and Stuff


The bulletins site is down.

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can.


Resources For Understanding The War


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.

Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.

https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

Almost every Western media outlet.

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

[Germany] Annalena Baerbock quote on the economic sanctions on Russia in the Handelsblatt, 24 August 2023

"Economic sanctions are supposed to have an effect. But that's not been the case. This is because the logic of democracies doesn't work in autocracies"

Germany is ruled by real brain geniuses

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Feminist foreign policy, while cutting founding for womens shelter internally. Thats the greens for you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Female foreign policy is when 500,000 working-class mothers lose their sons an daughters. Real ghoul shit.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly I don’t blame them (except for the chauvinist attitude) because it is almost impossible to predict complex non-linear systems, and (mainstream neo-classical) economists are not taught to understand the global economy as a complex system, where a slight deviation can lead to highly divergent, unexpected outcomes.

This is why climate science is so far ahead of economics, and even then our climate models are still deeply flawed, and why every few months you see headlines like “climate change is actually worse than we thought”, because just a slight change in temperature is going to kickstart entire feedback loops that we never even knew about before.

I was just responding to another user here the other day, who kept insisting that I twist the failure of sanctions to fit a “narrative” that says “look Russia is so much stronger and powerful” lol as if I am some pro-Russian propagandist. She kept saying that “there is no way the Europeans didn’t see that Russia could just sell its energy to China and India”.

The fact is, they saw it, and didn’t believe it could happen: why should China and India risk upsetting America and Europe and give up their strong consumer base in exchange for the shallow market in Russia?

China’s economy is so much more intertwined with Europe and America, and its import from Russia was tiny anyway. The European chauvinists were so used to Global South countries begging them for their investments (please, come to our country to exploit our labor, please splurge your investment on us!), that they simply could not have foreseen that China and India would oppose the sanctions and risk upsetting them - “without our strong consumer base to buy Chinese products, China would collapse!”.

That many Global South countries made the decisions to not sanction Russia were political decisions that simply could not have been predicted. And this goes back to the global economy being a complex, non-linear system. If the Americans had, maybe, only seized half of Russia’s foreign reserves, maybe more countries would have been more compliant? Maybe 10% less? 20% less? You cannot have foreseen that. The fact is that they went overboard with their sanctions and produced an unanticipated outcome.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This reminds me of the time I heard Michael Hudson dunking on Paul Krugman for not understanding international economics. Hudson was pointing how that Krugman was only talking about funds flows between nations from trade when really they need to consider government transfers as well, which are significant. I admit that, at first, I thought Hudson had to be missing something. But looking into it he was right, Krugman totally left that out.

I get that Krugman is really now more of a pop column writer than pure economist… but he really does have all the right bona fides - he is a true neoclassical economist. And even he was getting basic stuff wrong when it comes to international economics. Easy for me to believe economists in the west genuinely believed the sanctions would work.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"We have experienced, that rational decisions, rational measures, which one takes between civilized governments, can not end this war."

If the following is what Germany considers "rational decisions":

  • Refusing to support negotiations
  • Deindustrializing your own country
  • Letting the Americans take advantage of you economically
  • Shutting down nuclear power plants in the face of an energy crisis
  • Arming groups that openly and proudly display Nazi symbols
  • Pushing unpopular domestic policies that drive voters to the AfD

Then I'd hate to see what they consider irrational decisions.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Let's not forget one of the very important rational decisions, looking the other way while the americans destroy your infrastructure

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Ah yes, sanctions, one of the rational measures taken between civilized governments thonk

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It is not our fault that the sanctions doesn't work! It is the deceitful Russians who are too barbaric for sanctions to work!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

the cream of the transatlantic crop