Linguistics

532 readers

2 users here now

Welcome to the community about the science of human Language!

Everyone is welcome here: from laymen to professionals, Historical linguists to discourse analysts, structuralists to generativists.

Rules:

Stay on-topic. Specially for more divisive subjects.
Post sources whenever reasonable to do so.
Avoid crack theories and pseudoscientific claims.
Have fun!

Related communities:

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

105

Evidence of oldest known alphabetic writing unearthed in ancient Syrian city (hub.jhu.edu)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archive link: https://archive.ph/cIz4A

It's dated to be from around 2400 BCE. The article doesn't clarify if it's a true alphabet or an abjad, but either way it's interesting.

EDIT: see also https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/worlds-oldest-alphabet-discovered/ for a less pop-linguistics narrative of the same discovery.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Pop linguistics is prone to those inaccuracies, by oversimplifying complex matters. Thanks for pointing it out.

It's a bit easier / faster to learn how to use a phonetic/phonemic writing system (alphabets, abjads, abugidas, syllabaries...) than it is to learn a logographic system.

Japanese has a good example of that - children at age 6 are taught hiragana (syllabary), katakana (syllabary) and kanji (logographic). While they're expected to have learned the first two by the end of the year, it takes them around 6 years to learn the 1000 kanji expected for reading proficiency.

But that's it; calling it a "revolution" is a big stretch. Specially when even logographic systems show some developments in this direction, with hieroglyphs for example showing phonograms all the time, and the modern Han writing system having both semantic and phonetic parts (granted, they only work 100% for Middle Chinese, and certainly not for non-Sinitic languages like Japanese, but still).