this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
513 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1871 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk is facing criticism for targeting Ashley Thomas, a federal climate official, by reposting a right-wing troll’s comment labeling her job as a “fake job.”

Musk’s actions, reminiscent of his past harassment of ex-Twitter employee Yoel Roth, prompted concerns about the safety of federal employees.

This comes as Musk prepares to co-lead Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency, aiming to cut $1 trillion from the federal budget, potentially outsourcing roles to private companies.

Critics argue Musk’s tactics intimidate public servants while benefiting billionaire-owned businesses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The thing is, it's already effective...

VA has scheduled more retirements for December than they've ever had in a single month, and that includes 2016. Not unique to them either, it's up pretty much across the board with all the agencies.

It's fucking infuriating because federal employees have some of the strongest unions in the country, but everytime a shit head gets elected, all the senior people with a sense of ethics decide to get out of the way opening up senior positions for people without ethical concerns of the incoming administration.

As fucked up as it is to say it, shit hasn't gotten bad enough that people want to fight. They still think they'll be better off staying out of it.

If anybody wants one less person in the federal government who will just do whatever trump says and won't resign when things start to suck (they're gonna suck). Then be the change you want to see. Don't let them be the only ones trying to get a spot.

www.usajobs.gov

There's a reason Republicans are constantly trying to get good people to quit federal service.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you've applied to several hundred jobs on USAjobs already, even with full veterans preference, you already know you'll basically need a professional Government resume writer to assist you if you want anything higher than, like, a GS-8.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Shotgun method.

Don't use a one page resume, make it like 5 pages and talk about everything

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I look forward to you taking a government job under a hostile administration with your coworkers constantly looking to make your life hell and get you fired, endangering your career and making financial security impossible. Hopefully you don't have a family. I appreciate that you're willing to make this sacrifice for us, @[email protected].

[–] tabarnaski 11 points 1 week ago

What you describe could be said about any management job, government or private.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I didn't realize the Department Of Giving Up had a presence on lemmy.

edit: on further inspection, if you check the comment history of this account, you can piece together a picture of a professional wet blanket turned loose by an evil empire to bum a resistance out with low-energy snark.

I personally recommend a block.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Right, because pointing out the hypocrisy in asking other people to change their lives and enter government service so you can benefit from it is "giving up."

You can't possibly believe that our choices are to resist a rising fascist theocracy by being a government functionary or else giving up. Don't be absurd. Talk about being a low-energy, snarky wet blanket. Yeesh.

Your blocking suggestion is a good one though, so I'll block you and make things easier for both of us. Good luck out there!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey, for all you know I served in the military under GW, and this isn't even going to be my first 4 years as a federal employee under trump...

You do realize there's a shit ton of people who would fit that....

Right?

And that someone who's lived that life, would often be highly opinionated about politics and tend to often have insights into how shit works? That they would have been a little stressed about this election and spent the run up trying desperately to convince people to take the path most likely to get a Dem in office at every step of the process?

Like, this is the Internet, I could also just be a dog or an edgy teenager sitting in study hall...

But what's the point in you trying to dissuade good people from entering federal service in either case?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Right on bud...

Have fun spending your time online convincing people not to fight fascism then I guess.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have fun telling people to do the hard work you won't do but want to benefit from.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You come across as a very unlikable person.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know if this is a good enough reason to encourage someone to work for the government. It's a dead end for good people so you need to play the game, be happy with being a drone, or leave.

No movement is going to stop the momentum at this point. This reactor is going to have to spin itself faster until it breaks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool...

So you think that nothing can be fixed so you personally have given up on fixing things.

That is your choice, and I won't try to talk you out of it.

Can you please show the other side the same decency, and not try to talk them out of doing whatever is possible to fix shit?

If you're right it doesn't matter. If you're wrong, and shit gets fixed...

Well, that works out even better for everyone, including yourself.

If you're going to disengage, then disengage. Dont hang around trying to talk people into also giving up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why would I ever advise somebody I care about to enter a field in which they will be completely devoured alive or droned out from the heart out?.

You need to take care of yourself and your own mental health first before you start entering into endeavors that have very little chance of succeeding. The government is orders of magnitude more powerful than any individual or any group, and has way too much momentum at this point. The only thing we can (practically) do is let it spin until it breaks. We're not organized to do anything beyond that. Aaron Sorkin set us back 15 years by writing about this stuff like it's Camelot.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same reason you'd support them being a cop or a teacher.

If good people never go into an important field because there's assholes or it's risky, and that just leaves more assholes in important fields.

You need to take care of yourself and your own mental health first before you start entering into endeavors that have very little chance of succeeding

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they_came_...

I hope that helps explain it.

But four years isn't as long as it seems, and like I said, I'm not trying to change your mind, but I hope it changes.

I also hope you stop trying to convince others not to fight, but I'll never know either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's not that I don't want them to fight it is that their drive to fight this fight is distracting them from the real fight. And every time we engage on this level we ignore the systemic issues. The issues are not gay rights or book burning or taxes. The issue is democracy and money in politics.. it is simply impossible to fix any other issue without fixing those two. First, anyone who tries to sell us anything but those two initiatives are not acting in good faith and are being selfish with their personal goal or acting nefariously. Folks who really want to solve the problem will look for the real problem and stop chasing at all of these little triggering red herrings. There are literally hundreds of these issues and none of them matter at the end of the day. Getting good people involved in government is another one of those lies. And it's interesting you brought up being a cop because that is probably the only profession that is more toxic to good people than politics.

The whole thing needed a reset for decades. It's a shame that Trump got to be the one to do it. But the Dems proved they couldn't handle Trump and they were not ready to lead the country against his handlers. Out maneuvered again and it's getting embarrassing at this point. Like it or not, Trump is painting with the same brush he used in the election, and it's still working for him.