Conflit Israelo-Palestinien
Rules
-
Les relais de propagandes de Tsahal, ne sont tolérés ici.
Par exemple, les vidéos ou articles se basant sur la communication de l'IDF seulement, seront enlevés sans discussions. Exemple -
La propagande, accompagnée d’un éclairage clair, net et indéniable, peut etre tolérée. Celle-ci ne doit clairement pas pouvoir se faire passer pour une information, parmis tant d’autres. Le post aura vocation a discuter autours du contenu.
-
L'antisionisme, n'est pas un prétexte pour tenir des propos antisémites envers les personnes de confessions juives.
Des groupes juifs se battent contre l'état nazi oppresseur qu'est Israel. Pas d'amalgames tolérés. -
Marquer le contenu NSFW, d'une manière ou d'une autre pour éviter une consultation non voulue.
Pour discuter autours des règles de ce /c, c'est ici.
Ce /c est hébergé sur jlai.lu,
Consultez les régles génèrales de l'instance.
Elles sont en vigueur, et consultables ici.
Fediverse
view the rest of the comments
This article is so full of fillers and off-topic references. Only one quote at the end mentiones quadrocopters. Other stuff is a plain text mentioning supposed fire from the sky and supposed weird wounds left by something like nails.
Only two paragraphs are dedicated to what is one of the problems in creating a shooting drone - recoil, and that a 9kg drone could be okay for that in their own opinion. And, piecing together what author wanted to say but failed to, we add there a special nail-like bullets from before, meaning special weapons where recoil may be lowered to somehow tolerable levels. Our usual weapons are meant for us, 60-100kg humans staying firmly on the ground, that can't be said about copters. But they are probably overestimating the precision that can be achieved by rotors while in the air - current stabilization is okay for photography, dropping bombs down, but reliably shooting something at distance without a special homing munition is another challenge that is hardly probable just yet. And if they spam whole magazines of ammo just to hit something, that precision is even less possible to achieve because, again, recoil grows.
Therefore, I call it a gossip that needs further proofs. This article is inconvincing and seems made to intentionally confuse the reader with how it jumps around and has content about drones spread very thin and far between.
The term "quadcopter" has become a generic term for the small, highly mobile drones, initially intended for reconnaissance, which are mounted with assault rifles (technology like the Smash Dragon from Smart Shooter, with automatic target detection, lock, track, fully remote controled).
This can be mounted on commercial drones like the DJI Matrice 600 or military drones like the Thor from Elbit.
Or to describe the same kind of drones that drop explosives (this could also be a simple DJI dropping conventional grenades or IEDs).
Regarding the Smash Dragon technology:
Sources:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/terror-and-security/armed-drones-israel-hamas-war-gaza-hospitals-gunshots/
https://www.businessinsider.com/israel-drone-that-can-fire-a-sniper-rifle-while-flying-developed-2022-1
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2022/11/11/israels-urban-quadcopter-brings-search--attack-in-one/
https://euromedmonitor.org/en/article/6166/Gaza:-Israel-systematically-uses-quadcopters-to-kill-Palestinians-from-a-close-distance
Videos :
A quadcopter drop explosives in North Gaza
Israeli M26 Fragmentation Grenade can be seen attached to the drop mechanism from a drone. This mechanism is reportedly from a DJI Mavic drone (or similar) shown in the later part of the video that was shot down in the West Bank.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c7893vpy2gqo