this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
139 points (87.6% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2259 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because cost of megawatt-hour via nuclear power plant decreases every year. EVERY YEAR.

Nothing in that table is dropping every year.

Capital cost spiked a decade ago, and are now still higher than 2002 levels. Fuel spiked at a similar time and is now back to 2004 levels (but not as low as 2007). Similar story for operating costs.

Basically it looks like 2008 sent nuclear cost through the roof, and it's only just recovering to start of the century prices.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

At the top it states these are the costs in USD per MWh after adjusting for inflation.

As you can see, the Operating Costs did in fact spike between 2004 and 2012, but then continued to decrease every year from 2015 to 2020. The Total Generating Costs saw the same spike sometime after 2007 but again went back on the trend of decreasing after 2015.

You've made an excellent point of arguing semantics. I concede that "every year" isn't as accurate as saying "most years except for the spike in 2004-2012".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Falling back to the level they were before the 2008 financial crisis isn't indicative of the technology advancing and a general downward trend. It's just the market normalising.

If we had been not investing in nuclear plants only whilst costs were sky high I'd think you'd have an argument, but we've been avoiding nuclear investments for a lot longer than that.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

There have been a lot of technological advances, though. Maybe you just never noticed, but we've had advances in fuel assembly and coolants that allow operation at lower temperature ranges and smaller reactors.

In the future, potential new Thorium Reactors, almost all of which currently operational are for research purposes, could provide another huge leap forward as they produce less plutonium than other standard Uranium isotopes.

Plus, our technology for containing and handling plasma has grown in leaps and bounds, although most of that technology seems to be closely guarded in China so I don't have high hopes for it.