this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
55 points (91.0% liked)

World News

39096 readers
2497 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A Romanian appeals court found significant flaws in a human trafficking and rape case against Andrew Tate, his brother Tristan, and two Romanian women.

The court deemed parts of the indictment unclear, excluded evidence, and ordered prosecutors to amend or withdraw the case within five days.

Key issues included improperly explained charges, inadmissible witness statements, and vague asset confiscation details.

The ruling was called a “monumental victory” by Tate’s lawyers.

A second case involving trafficking minors and money laundering remains ongoing, while British authorities seek the Tates’ extradition for unrelated allegations.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] skulblaka 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For a very long time we had a robust system of public violence that prevented a lot of this. Not all of it, but a lot.

Back in the day if you were a sex pest and an asshole, chances were good that someone who lived in your community would either be firmly escorting you out of the local area never to return, or digging you a shallow hole back behind the churchyard.

Now if you were a royal sex pest then that's a different story, but guys like Tate? He's just some dude. In a past age someone would have broken 33 bones in his arms, legs and face and he might have even learned something from it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

For a very long time we had a robust system of public violence that prevented a lot of this. Not all of it, but a lot.

That's not as true as you want it to be, sadly.

People who abuse others tend to be very good at manipulating themselves into positions of power and authority in other ways too, and abusive people are often a product of the society and people they were raised by.

Conservative religious societies really aren't historically (or currently) known for treating their women and children well, and before very recently, conservative and religious was the default everywhere.

Also you might not be old enough to know just how much more common and socially ignored child abuse used to be, even 30 years ago. Spousal abuse too. Women and children have only recently gotten legal rights in many western countries.